行動体制の実現条件としての行動における連動的先導性と心理学的工作

概要

論文の詳細を見る
A new behavior would be organized by way of Measure Preserving Transformation of the relationships between two of the three regulatory systems: Signal, Object, and Behavior, which are mediated by a property of Pattern Preserving Transformation of the other of them. Helping the organization of a behavior is essentially considered to be a psychological intervention contingent with the behavior. In other words, the causal effectiveness of a psychological helping is not always predictable. That is why an instructor for helping a learner is necessarily expected to give good reflections and insights to the transformational interactions in the learning process. Why can such a psychological intervention, however, have an effect upon the behavioral formation of a learner? Consider an example of the skiing behavior of a girl aged seven. After trying every possible means in teaching her how to turn right and left in skis, the first author just shouted to her, "Turn right!" It was very strange to him that the shout could initiate a right turn of her. Reflecting upon her turning behavior in skis, an insight had come to him that the shout could first release a right turn of her head, and that it could initiate a right turn of her body in succession. Remember your behavioral coordination of walking when you try to turn right at the corner of a road, and you will also be able to notice that the first turn of your eyes to the right successively initiate the right turns of your head, shoulders, body, and legs. The shout must have facilitated her to transform the pre-established organization of walking into the new organization of turning in skis. Reconsiderations over several episodes in this paper on some cases of behavioral formation, such as skiing, bicycle riding, turning round a horizontal bar and so on, may indicate that a coordinated chain of behavior can play a facilitating or blocking role for mediating between psychological interventions and behavioral formations. Emotive behaivors of approach and avoidance will rise when one is put into a psychological situation where he is required to transform his organization of behavior. That's because the situation will, more or less, force him to get into the disruption of his pre-established organization of behavior, which gives him a foundation for transforming his behavioral organization. The episodes in this paper and such conceptions as Reafference and Exafference by Held (1965), may suggest that a tendency of approach and avoidance comes from an anticipation for a perceptual reorganization facilitated or blocked through a coordination of an assimilated or accomodated behavior, not simply from a result of success or failure. Behavioral situations, where regulatory matchings among the three systems go on simultaneously and successively, could be characterized into four categories as to whether a behavior and its behavioral context are contingent or dependent each other. They are constructed to be spontaneous, releasing, inducing, and forcing in terms of their nature of interaction.(See Table 1)
国際基督教大学の論文

行動体制の実現条件としての行動における連動的先導性と心理学的工作

スポンサーリンク

概要

著者

関連論文

スポンサーリンク