近代西欧国際組織構想概観 : 日本国憲法第9条の歴史的位置付けのために

概要

論文の詳細を見る
Since the Gulf-War(1991) Japanese people have been involved in the argument about their "International Contribution".In this situation some political parties propose the participation of the Japan Self Defence Force in the U.N. Force according to the Art. 43 of the Charter of the United Nations, and atack the opinions which reject military cooperation. But is the policy of the state, which renounces war and prohibits the maintenance of any military forces and so refuses to take part in the military operations, to be criticized as egoistic pacifism ? We should consider this problem also from the viewpoint of the history of the League of Nations plans. There were three common means to world peace in most of the League of Nations ideas or the collective security plans in modern western Europe (from Saint-Pierre to 1914 ) , -obligatory arbitration for pacific settlement of disputes, sanction against illegal states and arms reduction. With regard to arms reduction, it was the most radical and effective way for collective security to reduce each state's armies to the scale required for internal police purposes, and in consideration of the misery caused by modern war it is more necessary to reduce each state's armies thoroughly and to limit the military sanction as an emergency measure. Therefore the disarmament and nonmilitary contribution policy should not be criticized, but justified in the collective security system.
北海道東海大学の論文