三つ組みフォーマライゼーションと社会学理論 : ―古典，類型，事例―
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
Mathematical sociology provides a nice crossroad for multi-disciplinary communication. For an additional driver for the communication toward theory construction, I propose ‘triple-formalization’ that consists of three elements: classical theory, typification, and case study. Formalization of classical sociology has been emphasized by T. J. Fararo as neo-classical formalization. Our standpoint is very close to him; however, I additionally emphasize on coming and going before hurrying to unification. In this case, I mean to replace contemporary implications of formalization of a classical theory in a different classical tradition or in a broader (or a different) context of the same tradition. The linkage will bring us, not only a new insight for model specification, but also a new perspective for extending a theory to cover more complex processes. Many classical studies utilize typification in theory construction. However, it is so often difficult to capture logical construction of processes, in terms of which the researchers should define each conceptual axis and the relationship between them in their typification frameworks. Formalization of typification process is important here, not only because sociological theory is deeply related with such processes behind typification, but also because mathematical sociology is promised to contribute on clarifying such processes. Moreover, focusing on typification will make it easier to consider linkage with case study. In fact, as many classical studies rely on case study, the comparative secondary analysis of the cases could have great significance. In this case, formalization of typification process will provide generalized frameworks for interpretive comparative analysis and contribute to deepen theoretical implications of the cases. This approach that I call formalization of interpretive analysis of cases could be applied to methodological generalization of counterfactual analysis of a single case. For an illustration, I introduce the model of complementarity of role expectations. This model synthesizes Parsons and Heider traditions, and provides generalized typification for role relationships. Then, I will focus on some contradictory types and consider cases that could appear in the real world.
- 数理社会学会の論文
著者
関連論文
- 海野の共有地のジネンマ.モデル再考 : その妥当性と含意をめぐって
- 社会的ジレンマ・モデルの一般化 : 海野類型の拡張から
- 地域社会における意図せざる結果の処理 (意図せざる結果)
- 社会調査における複数回答の論理 : ブール代数による例解
- ロバート・D・パットナム [著]/柴内,康文[訳] 『孤独なボウリング-米国コミュニティの崩壊と再生』
- 知識調整メカニズムとしての役割 : 役割理論の課題と構図を求めて
- 三つ組みフォーマライゼーションと社会学理論 : ―古典，類型，事例―
- 社会関係資本と階層研究 : 原理問題としての機会の平等再考 ( 階層論の拡大する可能性 )
- 二次分析としてのComparative Narratives : 蜂の巣城紛争の再考(実証の姿 : その思惟と展開)
- 女性の地域移動と階層特性 : 1995年SSMデータによる分析
- 地域紛争事例のデキゴトバナシ比較分析
- ソーシャル・サポートの階層的差異について
- 『キャンベラの社会学的研究』
- ダイグラフによる役割モデル : 役割概念のフォーマライゼーションをめざして (フォーマル・セオリー)