教育行政制度原理の転換と教育行政学の課題(基調報告,戦後日本の教育行政研究(1)-義務教育学校「存立」の行政原理を問う,I 年報フォーラム)
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
The theory on "the right on education of the people," which divides educational matters into two spectrums: the internal and the external, and positions educational administration as the leading force in improving educational conditions, can be deemed as having been the principal theoretical framework taken up in the recent Educational Administration research. With regards to this theoretical framework which takes issues on the role of the state in public education, two arguments in contraposition have been antithetically debated: the theoretical framework questioning the state's character itself instead of disputing on the pros and cons of the state's involvement in education, and the theoretical framework pursuing on how to implement and govern educational administration in educationally effective approaches under the state's given positional authority . In response to the question of "what is the study of educational administration?," my succinct explanation is that the study of educational administration is a theoretical approach conceptualized through school board activities. This is not to say that the study of educational administration is to benefit actual practice. According to Foucault's schema positioning that non-articulated practice generates an environment for discourse, school board activities is an environment for the study of educational administration. The school board system of the United States is based on a spirit of idealist philosophy postulating that educational consensus is attainable among citizens who stand in opposition with general political affairs. This notion led to entail another idealist philosophy validating that, by being selected to serve as a school board member, the individual citizen will experience taking on government duties and hence have the opportunity to enhance public awareness in being a member of a democratic society. Turning to Japan, the most impending deficiency revolving around today's debate on the school board system lies in failing to face the significance of this idealist philosophy exemplified by the school board system.
- 日本教育行政学会の論文
- 2005-10-14
著者
関連論文
- IV 学校運営協議会をめぐる動能的・能動的分析 : 指定討論者としての発言(学校のガバナンスとマネジメントに関する総合的研究-学校運営協議会の法制化に見る学校ガバナンスの思想と制度-, 日本教育学会第63回大会報告)
- 自由民権運動と教育(その三)
- 自由民権運動と教育
- 自由民権運動と教育(その2)
- 学校のガバナンスとマネジメントに関する総合的研究 : 学校運営協議会の法制化に見る学校ガバナンスの思想と制度(課題研究(2))
- 課題研究1 学校のガバナンスとマネジメントに関する総合的研究 (日本教育学会第62回大会報告)
- 学校のガバナンスとマネイジメントに関する総合的研究
- 教育行政制度原理の転換と教育行政学の課題(基調報告,戦後日本の教育行政研究(1)-義務教育学校「存立」の行政原理を問う,I 年報フォーラム)
- 『新しいタイプの公立学校-コミュニティ・スクール立案過程と選択による学校改革』, 同時代社=日日教育文庫, 2004年, 219頁(VIII 学会賞-受賞者による著書紹介)
- 内的事項外的事項区分論と専門職主義の偏見 : 「教育学としての教育行政研究」批判についての批判的考察(特別機構論文,教育行政と他行政分野の連携と競合,I 年報フォーラム)