『戦後教育改革と指導主事制度』, 風間書房, 1995年(受賞者による著著紹介,VII 学会奨励賞)
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
(1) The purpose of this study The purpose of this research is to examine the meaning of foundation and reorganization of the teacher consultant system in post-war Japan. The teacher consultant system was founded by the Board of Education Law in 1948. When the Law Concerning Organization and Function of Local Educational Administration (LCOFLEA) was enacted in 1956, the obligation regulation of teacher consultants was changed. The Ministry of Education explained that duties of a teacher consultant are the same as the past ones. However, many teachers and educational specialists criticized that this change leads to revival of the old inspector system. We should research the history of the system of teacher consultants so that we can clarify the nature of the obligations of teacher consultants. In this book, the following problems were examined: Who reformed the local inspector system under the occupation, and why did they do it ? As the system of teacher consultants was founded in postwar Japan, the Ministry of Education published two guidebooks for teacher consultants. What ideas were these books based on? Why was the certificate for teacher consultants made? Why was it abolished? Immediately after the teacher consultant system was established, the Institute for Educational Leadership was developed. What did they study in this training ? How was the teacher consultant system changed after the LCOFLEA? In this book, much historical material in Japan and United States was analyzed, CIE Records, Trainor Collection, Sengo Kyouiku Shiryou, Tsujita Chikara Bunsyo, and so on. (2) The summary of conclusions The report of the first United States Education Mission in March 1946 recommended that old inspectors should be changed into supervisors who help teachers professionally, and that their qualification should be improved. This report did not describe the involvement of inspectors in the personnel administration of teachers. On the contrary, the Japanese Education Committee criticized it. The committee insisted that inspectors should have no relation with personnel affairs. The Ministry of Education thought that the old inspector system should be divided into administrative supervisors who took charge of personnel affairs and instructional supervisors who advise teachers on teaching and instruction. The CIE ordered the Ministry of Education to change inspectors into teacher consultants in December 1947. In the following April CIE presented the Ministry of Education a bill which CIE had made. The proviso "but they shall issue no orders and exercise no control" was attached by CIE to this bill. The law for Certification of Educational Personnel was then enacted in 1949. This law found certifications of teacher consultants, principals, and superintendents of education. CIE instructed to the Ministry of Education that it was necessary to make a system of these certifications. CIE tried to make teacher consultants be "on the teachers' side." This was connected with the idea of CIE that tried to diffuse empirical curricula in Japan. After the LCOFLEA enactment in 1956 and the revision of course of study in 1958, teacher consultants changed to be leaders "from above." On the other hand, supervisors in charge of personnel administration were newly founded in most prefectures. Then the reform plan of the Ministry of Education under the occupation was realized.
- 日本教育行政学会の論文
- 1996-09-27
著者
関連論文
- 教育の論理に基づく教員身分保障制度構築の必要性 : 教育公務員特例法の制定経緯の検討から
- 戦後「教育学部」史研究 (1)
- 新自由主義改革と教員免許制度 : 規制緩和・民間開放による教育専門性の危機(15-【B】教員免許制度を問い直す,1 一般研究発表I,発表要旨)
- 日本における指導主事制度と学校訪問機能 : 歴史的考察(課題研究報告1 : 教育指導職の養成・研修プログラムの開発(その2))
- ラウンドテーブルの概要(首長主導型教育改革のゆくえ-日米比較の観点から-,ラウンドテーブル7,発表要旨)
- 教員の人事行政に関する研究 : 転任人事の効果と改善課題に関する調査結果の概要(IV 研究報告)
- 船寄俊雄・無試験検定研究会編, 『近代日本中等教員養成に果たした私学の役割に関する歴史的研究』, 学文社, 2005年, 592頁
- 教育行政の独立と地方教育行政職員の専門性に関する史的検討(教育行政とプロフェッショナリズム,I 年報フォーラム)
- 大阪の教委批判が問いかけたもの(総括,公開シンポジウムI 首長主導教育改革と教育委員会制度-大阪府・大阪市の動向と全国的含意,III 大会報告)
- 発足期の指導主事と経験カリキュラム : 占頷下における指導主事養成の検討から(IV 研究報告)
- 縮小社会における教育財政と再分配(まとめ,課題研究2 縮小社会における教育財政と再分配,III 大会報告)
- 『戦後教育改革と指導主事制度』, 風間書房, 1995年(受賞者による著著紹介,VII 学会奨励賞)