Mead理論の検討とそのスポーツ的社会化論への適用可能性 : 「I」は主体性のベースか

概要

論文の詳細を見る
The purpose of this study was to examine Meadian theory and to discuss its applicability to the subjective sport socialization theory. The study was undertaken in the following procedure. 1) Reviewing the preceding study, it was clarified that the socialization into sport study neglected the subjectivity of socializee. By the way, in the symbolic interactionist's interpretation of Mead, the "me" represented the social aspect of self and the "I" represented the human subjectivity. Thus, according to this interpretation, it was said to be correct that the Meadian "I" played a significant role in the subjective sport socialization theory. At the end of this part, some attempts to apply the Meadian theory to the sport socialization theory were offered concretely. 2) Analysing Mead's eminent work titled "Mind, Self, and Society" in detail, it could understand that Mead bestowed double meanings on the "I", namely, the "I" as a response and the "I" as which responds. As a result of discussing the meaning of former "I", it became clear that it meant a real response which was difficult to know a priori and was expressed through the reflective thinking to conquest the problematic situation. Because on this account, as we were faithful to Mead, it was able to say that the reflective thinking was a base of human subjectivity, but it was not able to say that the "I" as a real response was so. 3) From above reason, it was concluded that the effort of existing subjective sport socialization theory as well as symbolic interactionism which attempted to include human subjectivity in the Meadian "I" as a response would fail inevitably. Finally, it was suggested that the reinterpreted Meadian theory in this study was available to explain human subjectivity in the process of sport socialization.
社団法人日本体育学会の論文
1994-03-01

著者

山本教人
九州大学健康科学センター

Mead理論の検討とそのスポーツ的社会化論への適用可能性 : 「I」は主体性のベースか

スポンサーリンク

概要

著者

関連論文

スポンサーリンク