ジェンダー・フェミニストはリバータリアンでなければならない(岡田章子教授退任記念号)
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
This paper aims to demonstrate the logical affinity between gender feminists and Libertarians by clarifying and reconsidering the exact connotation of "gender." Now it is a common knowledge to distinguish sex as the biological state of being male and female from "gender" as the socially and culturally constructed state of being male or female. However, by the end of 1990s, as Joan Wallach Scott says in the preface to the revised edition of Gender and the Politics of History, "gender" in generally accepted usage had become something quite different from what it really means. Some regard "gender" as a synonym for the differences between the sexes. Some think that "gender" denotes the social rules imposed on men and women. Some misunderstand that gender feminists aim to eliminate the difference between men and women. Some warn that gender feminists attack manhood, womanhood, masculinity, femininity, fatherhood, motherhood, heterosexuality, marriages and family values. These misinterpretations are caused by their failure to grasp the exact meaning of gender concept. The earliest meanings of "gender" were "kind," "sort" and "type or class of noun." Since the 14th century the word gender has been used as a grammatical term, referring to the classes of nouns and pronouns in Latin, French, Greek, German, Russian and other languages designated as masculine, feminine, neuter and common. In other words, "gender" is a way to recognize things by classifying them. We cannot see innumerable things as they are. To categorize them to classes according to shape, size, color and other distinctions is the first step for human beings to perceive the world. However, this perception is a judgment based on an illusion. In fact, properties, numbers and sets are merely features of the way of considering the things that exist. Only particular, individual objects exist. To classify things never leads us to know them, since we cannot have a true appreciation of all attributes that an individual thing has. Thus we can safely say as follows : Once you know that gender is "the knowledge that establishes meanings for bodily difference," we are necessarily induced to accept nominalism that universals or general ideas are mere names or inventions without any corresponding reality. That's why gender feminists have been resisting the consolidation of women into homogeneous categories. Such gender feminists are destined to become Libertarians. Libertarianism has a greater affinity for a nominalistic view about human existence than any other political thoughts, since it advocates the maximization of individual liberty in thought and action. Libertarians are committed to the belief that individuals, and not states or groups of any other kind, are both ontologically and normatively primary. All schools of Libertarianism take a skeptical view of "the common good," though they embrace viewpoints across a political spectrum, ranging from pro-property to anti-property (sometimes phrased as "right" versus "left"), from minarchist to openly anarchist. Libertarians share the notion that "the common good of a collective-a race, a class, a state-was the claim and justification of every tyranny ever established over men," as Ayn Rand, one of representative Libertarian thinkers, says in The Fountainhead, her novel. This is why Libertarians hold that activities such as drug use and prostitution that arguably harm no one but the participants should not be illegal ; people are free to choose to live any kind of life on their own risks on condition that their activities never violate other people's rights. Thus gender /Libertarian feminists refuse the general, collective image of women as victims and the oppressed. They seek to celebrate or protect the individual woman. They encourage women to take full responsibility for their own lives. They also oppose any government interference into the choices adults make with their own bodies, because they contend that such interference creates a coercive hierarchy and suppresses the individual woman.
- 2010-03-19
著者
関連論文
- ジェンダー・フェミニストはリバータリアンでなければならない(岡田章子教授退任記念号)
- 「アメリカのフェミニズム」の暴力志向を考える : 憲法修正第二条と民兵と脱国家世界の市民像
- アメリカ国民作家になったロシア亡命移民女性 : アイン・ランドの『肩をすくめたアトラス』
- アイン・ランドの資本主義観 : 反ビジネス文学風土の中でビジネスマンを祝福するAtlas Shrugged (生瀬克己教授追悼号)
- アイン・ランドの資本主義観--反ビジネス文学風土の中でビジネスマンを祝福するAtlas Shrugged
- ヴィジョンなき国家のアニメ : 大友克洋作Akira
- Mary McCarthyのThe Group再読 : 女性雑誌用小説/「新しい女」たちの挫折物語/早すぎたパワー・フェミニズム小説
- 研究発表第三室(日本英文学会第68回大会報告)
- Symposia第七部門「アメリカ文学研究と日本の大学の教養教育」(日本英文学会第76回大会報告)
- アイン・ランドの資本主義観--反ビジネス文学風土の中でビジネスマンを祝福するAtlas Shrugged
- ストリートスマート・フェミニストのための「強姦ナラティヴ」--Andrea Dworkin のMercy (特集:アメリカ文学と性暴力)
- 「男でも女でもないそれ以上の何か」 : ジェンダーから読むWinesburg, Ohio
- 多文化主義とポストモダニズムの90年代におけるフェミニズム表現って? : Sue Harrisonの三部作Mother Earth Father SkyとMy Sister the MoonとBrother Windの場合
- 陰画としての : The Glass Menagerie におけるその劇的機能
- 書くこととpolitical correctness : Susan SontagのThe Way We Live NowにおけるAIDS表現の場合
- 書評 巽孝之著『リンカーンの世紀--アメリカ大統領たちの文学思想史』
- 書評 下河辺美知子『歴史とトラウマ--記憶と忘却のメカニズム』
- Huckleberry Finnと詐欺師たち--物語内物語の示すもの
- 大不況期には使えなかったが、冷戦強化期には使えた何かについて--知識人のトラウマと大衆社会 (特集 フォークナーと大恐慌(時代))
- アメリカ現代児童文学のゴリヤク--ブスで馬鹿で貧乏で自閉的なあなたへ (特集:今、アメリカ児童文学がおもしろい)
- 巻末評論
- 「政治的に正しい」「90年代的」アメリカ児童文学って? (特集 変動する世界と児童文学)
- 清水真砂子「幸福の書き方」(宝島社 JICC出版局より改称,1992),「子どもの本のまなざし」(同)--物語をこわすこと・こわされなかった物語 (児童文学批評への注文) -- (評論集を読む)
- 「ジュニア・ブラウンの惑星」における都市--外部の風景・無化された疎外--「ジュニア・ブラウンの惑星」(ヴァ-ジニア・ハミルトン作/掛川恭子訳) (児童文学に描かれた)
- 儲ける--Atlas Shruggedが寿ぐ美徳の産物としての貨幣 (特集:アメリカ小説を支えるたち)
- 巨人に既製服を着せること--The Cider House Rules (特集:英米文学者の映画論)
- 冷戦とフェミニズム--「冷戦ナラティヴ」としてのThe Group
- Leaves of Grass/Children of Adam 詩群とフェミニズム批評 : 「自己のディスクール」と「世界性のディスクール」の間
- ホモセクシュアリティという思想 : アメリカ文学とフェミニズムの文脈から
- The Two-Character Play/懐かしい悪夢 : ***のテーマとその表現, 及び劇中劇構成と監禁のモチーフについて
- M.C. Higgins, the Great における「他者」としての少女像 : 制度/商品/ジャンルとしての児童文学の限界利用の一例として
- Virginia Hamilton の The Planet of Junior Brown : 「商品」としての児童文学とその戦略の具体例として
- あるいはの寓話 : Tennessee Williams の短編 "One Arm" 再読
- 「超淑女」のヤヌス的機能 : A Streetcar Named Desire と sexual politics