多文化主義とポストモダニズムの90年代におけるフェミニズム表現って? : Sue Harrisonの三部作Mother Earth Father SkyとMy Sister the MoonとBrother Windの場合
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
There is fairly general agreement that Sue Harrison's trilogy published from 1990 to 1994 is one of the literary fruits that multiculturalism has fostered. Harrison vividly and impressively represents the life and culture of the ancient Alute people, ancesters of Native Americans, based on her research and field work over many years, supported and stimulated by her own rich imagination. But it is not my present purpose to explore this area. My concern is in a feminist approach to this trilogy. Today's writers who try to create feminism-conscious stories confront much more sensitive and challenging problems than before. Liberal feminism originated from Europe in the 18th century. In the United States, in response to the civil rights movement in the 1960's, it developed into women's liberation movement in the 70's. However, with the permeation of multiculturalism in the 80's, propelled by the current of postmodernism, black feminists (womanists), lesbians and other minority groups' feminists have been criticizing the Caucasian/West/Judeo-Christian/middle-class/heterosexual-centerdness of liberal feminism. Nowadays feminists are expanding their argument into investigating the origins and structures of various discrimination systems, with and beyond the inquiry about how to reduce or end sexual discrimination. Some feminists fear that the present feminism agenda may neglect the problems peculiar to women and may result in delaying the dissolution of social unfaireness about women. Yet most feminists realize that it is one of their tactics, as well as one of their imperatives, to emphasize and promote their relationships and cooperative efforts with other discriminated groups. Thus contemporary writers must incorporate the above-mentioned feminist problems into their works if they want to satisfy feminist readers. We can safely state that Sue Harrison has achieved this challenge in writing Mother Earth Father Sky, My Sister the Moon, and Brother Wind. This trilogy is classified as a traditional and popular happy-ending fiction for women, in which a young heroine finally attains happiness through a series of torturous experiments and disasters; in the end she gets her own special protector, in most cases, her husband. Harrison's books also end with the heroine's delightful marriage or long-waited reunion with their family. In addition to this, we should note that the setting is in the prehistoric era, from B. C. 7056 to 7023. This means that Harrison's fictions have the advantage of being completely invulnerable from feminist critics' attacks. Criticizing the sexual dichotomy in the prehistorical setting is useless. Because writers must represent the factual aspects of their subjects in their realistic novels, even if some descriptions are offensive to feminists. Above all it is unfair to reproach the defects of past ages from a contemporary view point. But we are mislead if we regard this trilogy as a mere prehistory Harlequin Romance. Interestingly Harrison's books can satisfy not only non-feminist readers but also feminist ones. A close reading of these three books leads us to find many devices and episodes to demistify and invalidate patriarchism. In authentically traditional fictions, heroines cannot be really happy without being bound to some patriarchal family ststem. Harrison's heroines, even though they finally return to their male-dominated families and communities, are clearly characterized by a self-independence, self-respect and aggressiveness that we rarely see in women in the fictions with today's setting. Under the disguise of an obviously gender-biased traditional story, Harrison has inserted some unforgettable gender-free characters, female and also male, into her fictions. Harrison succeeds in fictionizing her materials from the standpoints of multiculturalism and feminism which the literary critics in the present postmodern era are ready to find in new novels. At the same time, Harrison fulfills the contradictory desire of conservative readers, who are in the majority, to consume their familiar plots in unfamiliar sceneries.
- 1997-02-20
著者
関連論文
- ジェンダー・フェミニストはリバータリアンでなければならない(岡田章子教授退任記念号)
- 「アメリカのフェミニズム」の暴力志向を考える : 憲法修正第二条と民兵と脱国家世界の市民像
- アメリカ国民作家になったロシア亡命移民女性 : アイン・ランドの『肩をすくめたアトラス』
- アイン・ランドの資本主義観 : 反ビジネス文学風土の中でビジネスマンを祝福するAtlas Shrugged (生瀬克己教授追悼号)
- アイン・ランドの資本主義観--反ビジネス文学風土の中でビジネスマンを祝福するAtlas Shrugged
- ヴィジョンなき国家のアニメ : 大友克洋作Akira
- Mary McCarthyのThe Group再読 : 女性雑誌用小説/「新しい女」たちの挫折物語/早すぎたパワー・フェミニズム小説
- 研究発表第三室(日本英文学会第68回大会報告)
- Symposia第七部門「アメリカ文学研究と日本の大学の教養教育」(日本英文学会第76回大会報告)
- アイン・ランドの資本主義観--反ビジネス文学風土の中でビジネスマンを祝福するAtlas Shrugged
- ストリートスマート・フェミニストのための「強姦ナラティヴ」--Andrea Dworkin のMercy (特集:アメリカ文学と性暴力)
- 「男でも女でもないそれ以上の何か」 : ジェンダーから読むWinesburg, Ohio
- 多文化主義とポストモダニズムの90年代におけるフェミニズム表現って? : Sue Harrisonの三部作Mother Earth Father SkyとMy Sister the MoonとBrother Windの場合
- 陰画としての : The Glass Menagerie におけるその劇的機能
- 書くこととpolitical correctness : Susan SontagのThe Way We Live NowにおけるAIDS表現の場合
- 書評 巽孝之著『リンカーンの世紀--アメリカ大統領たちの文学思想史』
- 書評 下河辺美知子『歴史とトラウマ--記憶と忘却のメカニズム』
- Huckleberry Finnと詐欺師たち--物語内物語の示すもの
- 大不況期には使えなかったが、冷戦強化期には使えた何かについて--知識人のトラウマと大衆社会 (特集 フォークナーと大恐慌(時代))
- アメリカ現代児童文学のゴリヤク--ブスで馬鹿で貧乏で自閉的なあなたへ (特集:今、アメリカ児童文学がおもしろい)
- 巻末評論
- 「政治的に正しい」「90年代的」アメリカ児童文学って? (特集 変動する世界と児童文学)
- 清水真砂子「幸福の書き方」(宝島社 JICC出版局より改称,1992),「子どもの本のまなざし」(同)--物語をこわすこと・こわされなかった物語 (児童文学批評への注文) -- (評論集を読む)
- 「ジュニア・ブラウンの惑星」における都市--外部の風景・無化された疎外--「ジュニア・ブラウンの惑星」(ヴァ-ジニア・ハミルトン作/掛川恭子訳) (児童文学に描かれた)
- 儲ける--Atlas Shruggedが寿ぐ美徳の産物としての貨幣 (特集:アメリカ小説を支えるたち)
- 巨人に既製服を着せること--The Cider House Rules (特集:英米文学者の映画論)
- 冷戦とフェミニズム--「冷戦ナラティヴ」としてのThe Group
- Leaves of Grass/Children of Adam 詩群とフェミニズム批評 : 「自己のディスクール」と「世界性のディスクール」の間
- ホモセクシュアリティという思想 : アメリカ文学とフェミニズムの文脈から
- The Two-Character Play/懐かしい悪夢 : ***のテーマとその表現, 及び劇中劇構成と監禁のモチーフについて
- M.C. Higgins, the Great における「他者」としての少女像 : 制度/商品/ジャンルとしての児童文学の限界利用の一例として
- Virginia Hamilton の The Planet of Junior Brown : 「商品」としての児童文学とその戦略の具体例として
- あるいはの寓話 : Tennessee Williams の短編 "One Arm" 再読
- 「超淑女」のヤヌス的機能 : A Streetcar Named Desire と sexual politics