修正コンティンジェンシー理論批判
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
This paper aims at reviewing the neo-contingency theory by Lex Donaldson, pointing out some theoretical problems concerning it, and suggesting new directions for organization theory. Donaldoson shows three theoretical points about the classical contingency theory: why do managers let their firms leave from environmentally fit condition, why do they know what fit is, and why do they reform the existing structure of their firms though they cannot always expect higher performance in the future than that of status quo? Suggesting organizational portfolio theory consisted of eight factors with his original concepts of“quasi-fit” and fit as“hetero-performance,”Donaldson tries to refine his concept of SARFIT(structural adaptation to regain fit).Reviewing them theoretically and respectively, we conclude that no factor but“nonexecutive director”is helpful and the new concept“the center of the gravity of organization”will contribute to building the new theory of organization which is dynamic as well as static.
- 長崎大学の論文
著者
関連論文
- 戦略の3要件と活動理論
- 組織研究と時間
- 組織の境界と重心
- 修正コンティンジェンシー理論批判
- 高級ブランドの崩壊に関する一考察
- 組織理論における共約不可能性
- 機能的仮説としての組織 : 911テロにおけるNEADSの事例
- 組織の重心:京都セラミックと松風工業の例を中心に
- 組織の同一性