組織の重心:京都セラミックと松風工業の例を中心に

概要

論文の詳細を見る
It is true that modern science, typically the Carnegie School,precludes value premises thoroughly. But when it comes to describingthe“dynamic equilibrium,”i.e. evolutional change, established scientificmethods are not enough. That is why they focus on“what”and“how”but leave“why”black box. Reviewing the two well-knownconcepts of“field of personal forces”and“zone of indifference”byChester I. Barnard (1938) critically, we point out that these conceptsare useful enough to explain the state of organization equilibrium, butnot to its dynamism. Instead, studying the case of startup of KyoceraCorporation, we introduce an alternative concept, that is“the center ofthe gravity of organizations.”It is the function of aspiration, love,ethos, and time perspective.