「学び」をめぐる仁斎学と東涯学との思想異同について : 学の根本としての「忠信」理解を中心に
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
投稿論文1. はじめに2. 仁斎学における「忠信」 (1) 本体と修為 : 修為の学としての「忠信」 (2) 学の根本としての「忠信」3. 東涯学における「忠信」 (1) 「刊本」での補正 (2) 東涯学における「学び」と「忠信」4. 「忠信」をめぐる思想異同の歴史的評価 : むすびにかえてIto Jinsai's School had been succeeded by his descendants until Meiji period. And so far it was seemed that his eldest son Togai was a faithful successor to Jinsai's doctrines. But recently it has been definitely shown by the progress of the bibliographical study on Jinsai's writings, which analyzes the differences between the final version of Jinsai's manuscripts and the publications of Jinsai's writings edited by Togai, that Togai was not always a mere expounder of Jinsai's doctrines. On the basis of the results of this recent study the purpose of this paper was to analyze the differences between the thought of Ito Jinsai and that of Ito Togai about "Learning", and to search the significance of the differences in the history of Tokugawa educational thought. Approximately speaking, Jinsai's thought of "Learning" was basically composed of his three doctrines. The first is that Jinsai thought "Learning" involves both "Substance" (which consists of humaneness, Tightness, propriety, and wisdom) and "Cultivation" (which requires that we are loyal, trustworthy, serious, and empathetic toward others). The Second is Jinsai found the reality of "Learning" in "Cultivation" rather than in "Substance". The third is Jinsai considered "Loyalty and Trustworthiness" as the base of "Cultivation". However above Jinsai's theoretical composition was largely revised by Togai. Firstly for Togai "Cultivation" did not belong to "Learning". Secondary Togai found the reality of "Learning" in "Substance". Thirdly Togai regarded the position of "Loyalty and Trustworthiness" occupied in "Cultivation" as relative. After all Togai's thought of "Learning" was composed on the basis of man's outer social norm rather than man's inner nature or ability. It was in a marked contrast to Jinsai's thought that considered "Loyalty and Trustworthiness" (which are inherent in man's nature) as the foundation of "Learning". If we assumed that the main stream in the first period of Tokugawa intellectual history had proceeded from Chu Hsi philosophy (that emphasized "Principle" inherent in all things, therefore in man) to Ogyu Sorai's one (that emphasized "Rites and Music" created by the ancient Sages and were external for man), it could be said that the development of the thought from Jinsai to Togai supported the stream of the thought from Chu Hsi to Sorai as a result.
- 慶應義塾大学の論文
著者
関連論文
- 政治と教育 : 教育は何であり、何でないか
- 討議とまとめ(公開シンポジウムII 日本における教育思想の伝統と系譜-近世教育思想研究の視点から-,日本教育学会第66回大会報告)
- シンポジウムの趣旨(公開シンポジウムII 日本における教育思想の伝統と系譜-近世教育思想研究の視点から-,日本教育学会第66回大会報告)
- 江戸儒学における教育認識の一特質について : 「心」の理解をめぐる朱子学と仁斎学の思想異同から
- 伊藤仁斎における「拡充」説の思想構造について : その教育思想としての特質
- 福澤諭吉における「政治」と「教育」の関わりについて(政治と教育 : 教育は何であり, 何でないか)
- 福澤諭吉における「政治」と「教育」との関わりについて
- 「五倫」道徳の成立過程に関する研究(その二) : 孔子の人倫思想について
- 「為己」と「為人」
- 「五倫」道徳の成立過程に関する研究(その一)(100集記念号)
- 「教育不信」 の所在をめぐって (不信の時代)
- 伊藤仁斎の生涯と教育活動に関する素描
- 日本教育史学の中の近世儒学思想
- 「学び」をめぐる仁斎学と東涯学との思想異同について : 学の根本としての「忠信」理解を中心に