直観論的価値論をめぐる諸問題

スポンサーリンク

概要

• 論文の詳細を見る

• I intended in my treatise to make clear the open questions about the theory of value in intuitionism. Most of intuitionstic theory of value are intimately connected with the objective theory of value. Far from that, they presuppose the latter. Accordingly, first of all, I tried to testify whether or riot we might approve of the objective theory of value, and then to find the open questions out. I believe that I found them in this theory by means of investigating the arguments in which the intuitionists regarded the value as an objective quality. For example, both Max Scheler and G. E. Moore, representatives of the intuitionists, asserted that the value is a non-natural simple quality. And both of them thought they could demonstrate the being and the characteristics of the value by means of comparing the value with colour. Accordingiy, I brought forward my argument in the following order: 1) Differences between value and colour, 2) Contingency of agreement about the value, 3) Changeability of value in accordance with the situations and the persons, 4) The characteristics of ethical judgment, which follow from the objective theory of value. (According to the intuitionists, all ethical judgments are synthetic, and either true or false.) I cannot but conclude through the above analyses that many open questions of intuitionism are derived from the connection between intuitionism and objectivism about value. I think the inttutionistic theory of value is by nature the subjective theory of it. Therefore, according to the intuitionists, we cannot help meeting the opposite estimations of the same value or the opposite ethical judgments, both of which are justified by them. Consequently, we must say that the theory of intuitionism has no ability to sufficiently resolve the social ethical problems. Therefore, lastly, I gave some suggestions as the clues to resolve these problems. That is, I suggested that we could find out the important keys to resolve the social ethical problems in the studies of the regels or the reasons that make the value valuable in society.

• 慶應義塾大学の論文

著者

• 小泉 仰

  慶應義塾大学

• 小泉 仰

  三田哲学会

関連論文

• 『知説』における西周の人間性論
• 福沢諭吉の学問論(文学部創設百周年記念論文集I)
• 『慶應義塾大学文学部創設百周年記念論文集』の発刊に際して
• 西周の「行門の論理」とその適用(第五十集記念号)
• ジョン・スチュアート・ミルの幸福と快楽主義的背理(橋本孝先生古希記念論文集)
• J・S・ミル、福澤諭吉、西周の功利原理適用方 (論文要約)
• 『福澤諭吉の宗教観』
• 福澤諭吉の宗教哲学序論 (21世紀と私たちにとっての福澤諭吉 : 福澤諭吉没後百年)
• 倫理学専攻のこれまでとこれから(文学部創設百周年記念論文集I)
• 沢田允茂氏『ミクロ倫理学とマクロ倫理学』に対する反論
• 西周訳『奚般氏心理学』と西の人間性論(名誉教授宮崎友愛先生記念論文集)
• 西周の『生性発蘊』とコントの人間性論 : 資料としての検討
• 『百一新論』における西周の人間性論と荻生徂徠
• 西周による統一科学の試み
• 現代アメリカ倫理学
• 「行為」について(II 倫理,慶応義塾創立百年記念論文集)
• 直観論的価値論をめぐる諸問題
• マックス・シェーラーに於ける「愛」について

もっと見る 閉じる

スポンサーリンク