教育費スポンサーとしての保護者モデル再考 : 高校生・大学生保護者質問紙の分析から
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
Why do parents pay to have their children educated? The aim of this article is to clarify parental awareness and motives for paying for their children's education, focusing on the parents of high school and college students. Firstly, a theoretical framework is proposed for parental fund-injection behavior into their children's education. This behavior can be defined using two criteria. The first is Investment, Consumption or Gift, and the other is Child-Oriented or Parent-Oriented. Secondly, a statistical analysis is performed using survey questionnaires targeting parents of high school and college students, and the following results are obtained. 1. Over 50% of parents agree with the two statements, "College life is valuable for acquiring life knowledge, " and "Studying at university will improve a child's ability and skills." Many parents have a strong awareness toward their children finding employment and making progress. These results demonstrate that a relatively high rate of parents have the awareness of "Child-Oriented Consumption" and "Child-Oriented Investment." 2. The results of the factor analyses are as follows. Four factors are derived from high school student's parent data : "producer of child's ability, ""gift inter vivos, ""necessary costs, ""expectation of returns, " and three factors are derived from college student's parent data : "producer of child's ability, ""assessment of profitability, " and "gift inter vivos." 3. The model of parents as sponsors of educational expenses can be determined from the positive and negative signs of the factor scores. The largest group of parents of high school students is the "Living Wallet"(16.1%) whose factor scores are all negative. The second largest group is the "Devoted Self-seeker"(15.4%) whose factor scores are all positive. Looking at parents of college students, the largest group is the "Devoted Self-seeker"(31.2%), and the second largest group the "Living Wallet"(29.4%). Finally, based on these findings, parents as the sponsors of educational expense can be separated into two types. One fits the theoretical framework of this article and the other does not. The motives and awareness of the first type can be explained as Investment, Consumption or Gift. However, we cannot explain the latter type, or "Living Wallet." The motives of the "Living Wallet" do not fit within the framework developed in this paper. It is likely that they have extremely negative motivations, such as risk aversion strategies or educational expenses as insurance. Further research is necessary to clarify this issue.
- 日本教育社会学会の論文
- 2005-11-15
著者
関連論文
- ジェネリックスキル評価調査から見る学士課程教育の位相 : 学生はどこで何を身につけているか(III-3部会 大学教育の成果,研究発表III,一般研究報告)
- 私立大学における教育サービスと費用負担に関する研究 : 卒業生保護者調査から(III-5 高等教育(2))
- 1.大学生親子と教育費負担ルール : 近畿・九州所在大学調査を中心に(IV-7部会 教育費,研究発表IV)
- 4.アウトカム評価におけるジェネリックスキルの位置づけ(II-10部会 大学教育とスキル,研究発表II)
- 貧乏帝大生はどれくらいいたか? : 昭和初期学生生活調査における「苦学生2割5分説」の検証(IV-9部会 教育の歴史,研究発表IV,一般研究報告)
- 4.親子間教育費ルールと学生生活・親子関係 : 大学生質問紙調査分析を中心に(I-2部会 親子関係,研究発表I,日本教育社会学会第58回大会)
- 教育費スポンサーとしての保護者モデル再考 : 高校生・大学生保護者質問紙の分析から
- 私立大学生保護者の教育費投入動機の検討 : 父母の意識格差を中心に(教育費と行財政)
- 私立大学生保護者の教育費負担ルールおよび教育費投入意識の分析(2) : 子ども属性を中心に
- 保護者の教育費投入行動に関する検討 : スポンサーとしての保護者モデル再考(教育達成と教育費)
- 学校空間と生徒の生活意識 : 参与観察による学校診断・その2(15 中等教育・高校問題)