欧米学校体罰史研究 : その概観と批判
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
In this paper, the writer has attempted to clarify the pedagogical stereotype that has hindered many historians of education from pointing out that corporal punishment was never abolished in the early modern history of educational thoughts. In fact, according to the writer's perusal of the texts, the early modern educationists permitted a rod or beating as a last resort of correction, while they denounced corporal punishment. For example, John Locke did admire the use of the "Whipping" for children's "Obstinacy" and "Stubbornness" in his famous book Some Thoughts concerning Education (1693,see §78), though he denounced corporal punishment as a "slavish" one in the same book (§52). Locke admitted the corporal punishment as a means of discipline, for it was not outside (corporal) punishment. The same fact can be pointed out in the educational thoughts of Quintilian, Augustine, Erasmus, Joseph Lancaster, Pestalozzi, Horace Mann, and so forth. Lancaster, while he condemned the corporal punishment, recommended the punishment of pillory, fetters, and "the birds in the cage". Similarly, Mann maintained the corporal punishment as a lesser evil that cured the grave evil. In spite of such undeniable facts, many historians of education have ignored the facts. Why? The writer maintains that the eyes of historians of education have been blurred by the pedagogical stereotype that emerged to obtain a professional authority of the educational science in the nineteenth century. For example, Joseph Payne, as "the first professor of education in England", established such a pedagogical stereotype in his lecture "On Corporal Punishment as a means of discipline in Schools" (The Educational Times, March 1861). He pretended to demonstrate that corporal punishment was denied as a means of discipline as well as a means of promoting learning in the history of orthodox educational thoughts including John Locke's.
- 2001-03-15
著者
関連論文
- 少子化と教育関係のゆくえ : 家族と子どもの心性史(少子社会と子ども・学校・家族)
- 欧米学校体罰史研究 : その概観と批判
- かつて大人は〈若者〉だった--中年の時代のために (小特集・人生の諸段階の揺らぎと転生)
- トマス・ホープリーの教育思想
- 1860 年イギリス学校体罰死事件に関する報道と教育論評 : ホープリー事件裁判の教育史的再構成 (2)
- 1860年イギリス学校体罰死事件に関する報道と教育論評 : ホープリー事件裁判の教育史的再構成(1)
- 17 世紀イギリスにおけるヨーロッパ胎教論の一水脈 : トマス・トライオンの教育思想
- 「現代社会と教育(3)学校」教育科学研究会編--学校の「制度性格」を超えて希望へ
- ロック,ブラックストーン,そしてPower of Correction : 近代イギリスにおける家族・市民社会・国家と教育 研究序説(その2)
- 教育関係構造史研究入門 : 教育における力・関係・ハビトゥス
- III 教育社会学研究の評価と期待 教育の歴史社会学のために : 教育史と教育社会学 (教育社会学のパラダイム展開)
- 近代学校の規律空間と子どもの権利条約 (学校および学校論再考)
- 子どもの権利の系譜学--ホッブズからのラフ・スケッチ (「子どもの権利条約」と教育)
- 体罰否定の教育史的意義--英・米からの素描 (体罰の克服)
- イギリス1908年児童法とH・サミュエル : 自由帝国主義と児童政策
- 19世紀イギリスにおける少年分離監獄の成立--「矯正」思想とその子ども観