Descriptive analysis of the performance of two English proficiency groups on inferential and literal questions
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
The present study investigated the relationship between English language proficiency (including reading comprehension) and inferential ability. Inferential ability was measured by the Inferential Ability Test which consisted of two types of questions. One type involved literal questions which required only a surface level understanding of texts. The other type, inferential questions, demanded a deeper level understanding of the texts. The subjects were divided into two groups (15 each of skilled and less-skilled readers) based on the English Proficiency Test (EPT). The results of the experiment showed that the subjects were better able to answer literal questions than inferential questions, and that the performance of the skilled group on the inferential questions was better than that of the less-skilled group, whereas there was no difference between the performances of the two groups on the literal questions. Further analysis showed that the correlation between the EPT and the inferential questions was higher for the skilled group than for the less-skilled group, whereas the correlation between the EPT and the literal questions was higher for the less-skilled group than for the skilled group.
著者
関連論文
- Is there a lexical switching mechanism between English and Japanese?
- Descriptive analysis of the performance of two English proficiency groups on inferential and literal questions
- What is the major difference between skilled and less skilled readers?
- Script familiarity effects on the efficiency of processing numerals by Japanese university students with high and low English proficiency
- 言語能力別日本人大学生の英語の文章構造理解における差異
- 英単語の符号化効率性によって日本人学生の英語能力が予測しうるか?(第2言語習得論・英語学力論)