Beyond the European Community Treaty Provisions : A Need To Question the Cassis de Dijon Rule of Reason in Wouters?

概要

論文の詳細を見る
Ⅰ. INTRODUCTIONⅡ. THE CASSIS DE DIJON RULE OF REASON OUTSIDE THE FREE MOVEMENT JURISPRUDENCEA. A Reference to Reiseb?ro in WoutersB. Meca-Medina Confirms WoutersC. The Importance of Wouters' Confirmation in Meca-MedinaⅢ. CASSIS DE DIJON LINKED WITH WOUTERS VIA THE RULE OF REASONA. Free Movement of Goods Jurisprudence Guiding the InterpretationB. Dassonville as a Seedbed for Cassis de DijonC. Cassis de Dijon, Beyond DiscriminationD. The Rule of Reason in Cassis de DijonE. Cassis de Dijon and Wouters, Structural SimilarityⅣ. THE RULE OF REASON JUSTIFIEDA. The Rule of Reason within the Free Movement Jurisprudence1. Extending the Prohibitions' Scope of Application2. The Limited Scope of Exceptions3. Positioning the Rule of Reason: Article 28 EC or Article 30 EC?B. Free Movement Jurisprudence within Article 81(1) EC Necessary?2. Article 81 EC, Prohibitions and Exceptions2. Article 81(3) EC and Public Interest Considerations3. Wouters and Meca-Medina under Article 81(3)?4. Making Sense out of Wouters and Meca-MedinaⅤ. CONCLUSION
九州大学法政学会,Hosei Gakkai (Institute for Law and Politics) Kyushu Universityの論文
2009-10-01