都市という「世界」 : 社会的質と社会的プレカリティ概念を中心として(大会報告・共通論題:都市の公共性-主体・政策・規範-,2010年度政治経済学・経済史学会秋季学術大会)

スポンサーリンク

概要

• 論文の詳細を見る

• This paper examines the publicness of urban communities through the conception of social quality, as explored by some European social policy researchers since the 1990s in relation to the phenomenon of social precarity. To date, publicness has been explored primarily through the Habermasian conception of the term. However, it has become difficult to overcome this issue if, merely elaborating on Habermas's way of speech, we only emphasize arguments without regard to material conditions. In this paper, criticism of Habermas depends primarily on the conception of social recognition of Axel Honneth and the spatial conception of Lefebvre. Lefebvre in particular suggests that there is some possibility of raising separation and conflict in the interrelation among representation of space, spaces of representation and spatial practices, articulating their interconnectedness. His contention was to analyze critically the life space that modernity has generated from the viewpoint of everyday life. This paper is focused on articulating the subjective and objective characters of society to take up various issues of urban communities as life spaces, premised on Lefebvre's concern. If urban issues were a result of the structural nature of society, a key challenge would be to raise the quality of society. Social quality is defined as the extent to which citizens are able to participate in the social and economic life of their communities under conditions which enhance their wellbeing and individual potential. The conception of social quality thinks of this quality from the viewpoint of the ability of people to participate in society. On the other hand, social precarity refers to conditions of exclusion, grounded in the idea that social quality gets increasingly unstable and people do not partake in society. The most important thing is that we understand social precarity as a conflicting conception relating social quality on the whole, that is to say, grasp it as degradation of social quality relating subjective, objective and normative conditions of the social to the whole. Urban problems such as homelessness, unemployment and local economic decline are increasingly serious. Social precarity is a severe issue produced as the result of the breakdown of the conditions of social structure.

• 2011-04-30

著者

• 福士 正博

  東京経済大学

関連論文

• 市民的公共性と社会的経済(コメント1)(大会報告・共通論題 : 地域再編過程における協同と公共性)
• 基本所得の意義 : エコロジーの視点から
• 堀内隆治著, 『福祉国家の危機と地域福祉-地域社会政策論の試み-』, ミネルヴァ書房, 2003年, ix+292頁
• 韓立新著, 『エコロジーとマルクス 自然主義と人間主義の統一』, 時潮社, 2001年, ii+241頁
• 地域通貨 : 社会的経済論から見たコミュニティ・ワークの役割(大会報告・共通論題:グローバル化の世界と市民の連帯)
• 企業環境主義と持続可能な発展(第5セッション 環境問題,20世紀資本主義-歴史と方法の再検討-,創立五十周年記念大会報告集)
• EU共通農業政策改革とWTO : イギリスを中心として(大会報告・共通論題 : WTO体制と日本農業-農業・農政の世界的再編との関連で)
• イギリスの農業環境政策と共通農業政策改革 : デカップリングとクロス・コンプライアンス
• 農業政策社会と管理協定 : 1980年代のイギリス農業環境政策
• イギリスの有機農産物の現状
• 都市という「世界」 : 社会的質と社会的プレカリティ概念を中心として(大会報告・共通論題:都市の公共性-主体・政策・規範-,2010年度政治経済学・経済史学会秋季学術大会)
• 趣旨説明(大会報告・共通論題:都市の公共性-主体・政策・規範-,2010年度政治経済学・経済史学会秋季学術大会)

もっと見る 閉じる

スポンサーリンク