実在的区別distinctio realisについての覚書 : 田口啓子君の批判に答える(名誉教授宮崎友愛先生記念論文集)
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
名誉教授宮崎友愛先生記念論文集Actus of essence is form, and potentia of essence is matter. The form means definability of "what is", and plays the roll of determining principle ; the matter means indefinability of "what is" and plays the roll of limitting principle. According to the tradition since Pythagoras definability is "the determination by one" and indefinability is "the determination by two," or in other words, limitation. When we shift our attention from the dimension of essence to that of existence, actus and potentia, the fundamental concepts in metaphysics, come to relate themselves existence, and as a result our concern transfers to the division between actus of existence and potentia of existence. Actus of existence means esse simpliciter i.e. actus essendi, and this is existence in proper sense and is existence as determinig principle. On the otherhand, potentia of existence means esse quid as essence (whatness) i.e. modi essendi, categories of being in wider sense, and usually these are represented by the category of substance. Whatever hylo-morphological structure of substance might be, that is, either more material or more formal, the substance remains to be potentia against existence. As existence of a being proportionates to its essence, the essence itself constitutes an indispensable momentum of the existence. Not that the existence follows the essence, the essence follows the existence. Though the essence limits and conditions the existence, the essence cannot play the roll of determining in the place of existence. The roll of the essence in limitting and conditioning the existence must be preceded by the roll of existence to determine. The existence, after all, maintains its primacy over the essence. The distinction between existence and essence is real. Distinctio realis consists not only in the difference of things but also in a case, where the reason of distinction is recognized from the side of thing (a parte rei). Therefore there is exactly the same kind of distinction between existence as actus of existence and essence as potentia of existence, as that between form as actus of essence and matter as potentia of essence.
- 慶應義塾大学の論文
著者
関連論文
- 「存在の類比」の形而上学的意義
- 三田哲学を語る(文学部創設百周年記念論文集I)
- 実在的区別distinctio realisについての覚書 : 田口啓子君の批判に答える(名誉教授宮崎友愛先生記念論文集)
- 序文(名誉教授宮崎友愛先生記念論文集)
- 天使の自然的認識についての覚書(守屋謙二先生古稀記念論文集)
- 存在の自明性と物自体の仮設について
- 弁証法論理と形式論理について : 存在乃至対象の論理からみた両者の関聯(橋本孝先生古希記念論文集)
- 離存形相の資料・形相論的構成について
- スコラ的抽象理論の同一哲学的論拠克服の問題
- 存在論的認識論再論(横山松三郎先生古稀記念論文集)
- 人間形成における論証の意義
- 存在論的認識論に関する覚書(I 哲学,慶応義塾創立百年記念論文集)
- 汝性の条件としての物自体性について : 愛の条件としての汝性について(小林澄兄先生古稀記念論文集)
- 仏教哲学とアウグスティヌスの時間論について
- 價値論理の所屬範疇への基礎付
- 歸納的述語論理の綜合性格(船田三郎教授還暦記念特輯)
- 演繹的述語論理の分析性格に就て
- 辨證法論理の主體性格に就て(川合博士古稀記念特輯)
- 存在の論理學 : 序論
- 主語論理の研究
- 述語論理の諸特性