存在論的認識論に関する覚書(I 哲学,慶応義塾創立百年記念論文集)
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
I 哲学,慶応義塾創立百年記念論文集This article is an approach to the epistemological problems from the ontological point of view. One of the reasons why modern philosophers chose the consciousness rather than the being as the main topic of their thinking and thus formed a subjective philosophy is that they confused the consciousness of being, which is intentio prima with the consciousness of consciousness, intentio secunda. They considered the consciousness of consciousness which is a sort of self-consciousness as a requisite for the consciousness of being. But actually the consciousness of being can be realized only with the being of consciousness and even without the consciousness of consciousness. This article explains by a phenomenological analysis how this is possible. Now Scholastics divide the process of cognition into the cognition of concept (cognitio notionis) and the cognition of judgement (cognitio judicii). It is a fact that the aposteriori verification is necessary and is possible especially concerning the cognition of judgement. But as to the cognition of concept no one can directly prove the unity between the being and the concept of being. This is the second reason of modern subjectivism. We give an indirect verification for this unity according to the aposteriori statistics which is based on the fact that the direct verification of the cognition of judgement was effectively achieved. In the cognition of judgemdnt, the consciousness of the grasp of thing-in-itself is necessary as well as the grasp of thing-in-itself, but in the cognition of concept, the grasp of thing-in-itself can exist without any consciousness of the grasp of thing-in-itself. The consciousness of grasp of thing-in-itself requires the self-consciousness while the grasp of thing-in-itself does not necessarily accompany the self-consciousness. This grasp of thing-in-itself is nothing but the consciousness of being, that is, the concept of being, which is indirectly verified in an aposteriori way. Thus the critical epistemology, when it is based upon the ontology, brings about the empirical realism.
- 慶應義塾大学の論文
著者
関連論文
- 「存在の類比」の形而上学的意義
- 三田哲学を語る(文学部創設百周年記念論文集I)
- 実在的区別distinctio realisについての覚書 : 田口啓子君の批判に答える(名誉教授宮崎友愛先生記念論文集)
- 序文(名誉教授宮崎友愛先生記念論文集)
- 天使の自然的認識についての覚書(守屋謙二先生古稀記念論文集)
- 存在の自明性と物自体の仮設について
- 弁証法論理と形式論理について : 存在乃至対象の論理からみた両者の関聯(橋本孝先生古希記念論文集)
- 離存形相の資料・形相論的構成について
- スコラ的抽象理論の同一哲学的論拠克服の問題
- 存在論的認識論再論(横山松三郎先生古稀記念論文集)
- 人間形成における論証の意義
- 存在論的認識論に関する覚書(I 哲学,慶応義塾創立百年記念論文集)
- 汝性の条件としての物自体性について : 愛の条件としての汝性について(小林澄兄先生古稀記念論文集)
- 仏教哲学とアウグスティヌスの時間論について
- 價値論理の所屬範疇への基礎付
- 歸納的述語論理の綜合性格(船田三郎教授還暦記念特輯)
- 演繹的述語論理の分析性格に就て
- 辨證法論理の主體性格に就て(川合博士古稀記念特輯)
- 存在の論理學 : 序論
- 主語論理の研究
- 述語論理の諸特性
- 時間について
- 存在の時間か意識の時間か : 実在論者の考え方