インド鉄鋼業の発展と技術吸収力 : 日本の経験をふまえて(上)

スポンサーリンク

概要

• 論文の詳細を見る

• This paper has tried to analyze the uniqueness and universal features of Industrialization in the case of Indian steel industry from a view of "technology absorption", as compared to a Japanese experience (as a successful case of late-industrialized country). The findings are as follows: The first is that when the modern integrated iron and steel technology was transplanted from the West at the beginning of 20th century, both India and Japan were technologically lagging behind about 20-30 years, but the way it was transplanted makes a sharp difference between the two; India faced much more difficulties than Japan, such as lack of technological accumulation, resource mobilization under the colonial state. The second is that in terms of technology absorption, there was a distinct difference between the Pre-Independence and Post-Independence India; in the former period, the modern integrated technology was absorbed better than the latter period so as to increase productivity and diversify products. The third is that the higher the modern steel technology was absorbed, the more accelerated productivity growth between the production processes of pig iron making, ingot steel making and finished steel making, what we call "growth wave" were observed in both India and Japan. The fourth is that the absorbing capability of integrated iron and steel technology was relatively lower in Post-Independence period than Pre-Independence period, which was diametrically different from the Japanese experience.

• 麗澤大学の論文

著者

• 大場 裕之

  麗澤大学

関連論文

• インド鉄鋼業の発展と技術吸収力 : 日本の経験をふまえて(下)
• インド鉄鋼業の発展と技術吸収力 : 日本の経験をふまえて(上)
• アジア諸国の機械産業における産業発展のパターンと産業政策 : 自動車産業の事例を中心に

スポンサーリンク