シカゴ・プランとR. M. ハッチンズ : 1930〜40年代のシカゴ大学カレッジ・カリキュラム改革をめぐって
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
This paper historically examines the relations between Robert Maynard Hutchins' ideas of higher education and the actual college curricular reforms in history during his presidency and chancellorship at the University of Chicago. Hutchins at the age of thirty, Dean of the Yale School of Law, was named to be the fifth President of the University of Chicago on April 17, 1929. While he was President (1929-1945) and later Chancellor (1945-1951) of the university, many innovative educational concepts and practices were introduced particularly to the collegiate education of the university. The curricular reforms and controversial educational programs at the College of the University of Chicago during the 1930s and the 40s, during Hutchins' presidency and chancellorship, was called "The Chicago Plan," which was one of the most comprehensive experiments in general education in the history of American higher education. However there are lots of confusions about the relations between the educational ideas of Hutchins and the Chicago Plan. It is generally believed that the plan was completely the embodiment of the ideas of Hutchins, and that the plan offered the prescribed Great Books curriculum for all college students. The Chicago Plan has been loosely identified with the curriculum of St. John's College of Annapolis, Maryland, or with the Great Books program which has been conducted in the university extension. On the contrary, this paper will prove that the Chicago Plan was somewhat removed from the educational ideas or ideal plans of Hutchins. The curriculum offered in the Chicago Plan never carried a complete great books program. Through a historical analysis, this study demonstrates that the Chicago Plan is not President Hutchins' original or favorable one. Hutchins took metaphysics for a guiding principle of higher education. It was reflected in his views on the administrative system of university and the ideal curriculum of general education at college. He intended to divide a university into four divisions, the College Division, the Division of the Metaphysics, the Division of the Social Sciences, and the Division of the Natural Sciences. His purpose of general education was to train the minds of students for intelligent action which meant to study the first principles, namely, metaphysics. So his ideal program of college education aimed to help students to master the leading ideas in the principal fields of knowledge which could be learned by reading and understanding the great books, and to help them to learn the arts of reading, writing, and thinking which he called the liberal arts, in his context, it meant grammar, rhetoric, logic, and mathematics. Have such ideal plans of Hutchins ever been attained at the University of Chicago? A historical study from the following points of view will show an answer to this question. 1. On October 22, 1930, the University of Chicago was reorganized into five divisions, the College Division, the Division of the Biological Sciences, the Division of the Humanities, the Division of the Physical Sciences, and the Division of the Social Sciences. But there was not the Division of Metaphysics which included in Hutchins' original plan. 2. The College faculty adopted the new college program on March 5, 1931, and it put into operation the following autumn. It included the system of comprehensive examinations at the end of the courses by an independent examination staff. The plan of comprehensive examinations, however, had been already seen in the unaccomplished college program in 1928. 3. On November 19, 1932, President Hutchins proposed grouping the last two years of the secondary school with the first two years of college, and to form a new college devoted entirely to general education. At the end of that four-year period, the student would be given a Bachelor of Arts degree. But it revived an earlier suggestion of William Rainey Harper, the founding president of the University of Chicago. 4. The major curricular reforms at the College of the University of Chicago in 1932, 1937, and 1947 never adopted a complete great books program which was Hutchins' ideal curriculum. To conclude, the Chicago Plan was never Hutchins' original plan or his ideal program. Thus Hutchins was in deep disappointment over his failure in the reforms and experiments at Chicago. But the failure played an important role on developing his educational ideas. His experience and failure as president of the University of Chicago changed his educational thought, so that he deepened his insight into the reality of American education and society.
- 国際基督教大学の論文
著者
関連論文
- 10.戦後教育研究の「失敗」について(5 ラウンドテーブル,発表要旨)
- 意味としての大学/機能としての大学
- ダイアンラヴィッチ著, 末藤美津子・宮本健市郎・佐藤隆之訳, 『学校改革抗争の100年 20世紀アメリカ教育史』, 東信堂刊, 2008年7月発行, A5判, 638頁, 本体価格6,400円
- 教育問題としての「教養/文化」--その隘路と展望 (研究討議 「教育問題」としての文化)
- 「故郷」のある実践理論としての教育哲学研究--市村尚久元代表理事へのインタビュー (『教育哲学研究』一〇〇号記念特別号 教育哲学研究の過去・現在・未来) -- (教育哲学研究の履歴)
- コロキウム 歴史のなかの「読むこと」--ラーニングの比較思想=社会史の観点から
- 司会論文 「運動」の終焉と再始動--教育思想史の固有性への内向か、越境に向けての拡張か (シンポジウム 検証:思想運動としての教育思想史学会--私たちには何ができたのか/できなかったのか)
- ロバート・M・ハッチンズの大学アドミニストレイター論(35.【一般B-5】高等教育政策と大学の自己変革-大学改革における学長の役割に関する比較史研究の試み-,一般研究発表II,発表要旨)
- 教育改革における日本教育学会の役割(常任理事会企画・特別シンポジウム,発表要旨)
- R3.日本教育学会のあり方を考える(2)(ラウンドテーブル,発表要旨)
- 教育政策と教育学研究との対話 : 教育学は政策学たりうるのか(公開シンポジウムI,日本教育学会第66回大会報告)
- 大学教育の再構築-専門職化と教養教育再編の狭間で-(話題提供3「『リベラル・ラーニング』と教養形成」)
- 教育哲学の戦略/戦略としての教育哲学 (課題研究 教員の養成教育において教育哲学の果たすべき役割とは)
- エイブラハム・フレックスナー著, 坂本辰朗・羽田積男・渡辺かよ子・犬塚典子訳, 『大学論 アメリカ・イギリス・ドイツ』, 玉川大学出版部刊, 2005年11月発行, A5判, 350頁, 本体価格5,800円 / クラーク・カー著, 喜多村和之 監訳, 『アメリカ高等教育 試練の時代1990-2010年』, 玉川大学出版部刊, 1998年1月発行, A5判, 169頁, 本体価格4,000円
- 書評 田中智志著『人格形成概念の誕生--近代アメリカの教育概念史』
- 第6回:教育研究創発機構公開研究会「日本の教育システム-教育の失敗-」(人文・社会科学振興のためのプロジェクト共催)(III.教育研究創発機構公開研究会・シンポジウム)
- 遠景としてみる大学・高等教育研究 : 周辺性・棲み分け・改革連動(連載企画: 専門分野の最前線と研究動向)
- 書評 藤井千春著『ジョン・デューイの経験主義哲学における思考論--知性的な思考の構造的解明』
- 1980年代アメリカ教育改革論議と伝統主義教育思想(1) : 教育におけるエクセレンス概念の把握をめぐって
- シカゴ・プランとR. M. ハッチンズ : 1930〜40年代のシカゴ大学カレッジ・カリキュラム改革をめぐって
- ブラメルドによるハッチンズ批判の検討 : ハッチンズ自由教育思想の再評価に向けて
- 山本孝司著, 『超越主義と教育 ブロンソン・オルコット思想研究序説』, 現代図書刊, 2011年3月発行, A5判, 334頁, 本体価格2,667円
- 教育はどのように問われるべきか : 大学「教育」概念の歴史的再構成に向けて (教育はどのように問われるべきか)