後向き帰納法は現実に使われているか? : 実験による分析
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
This paper studies whether decision makers really use backward induction in their real life. Our approach is to test the model including present bias suggested by O'Donoghue and Rabin in 'Doing it Now or Later' is applicable or not. We studied it as real choices of subjects in several ways. We make our subjects select the order that they will present in their class. We made it different in two ways. (1) We made a difference in the degree of difficulty of preparing the presentation. (2) difference in the evaluation of presentation by the order: The earlier student presents their task, his evaluation is higher. In both cases, we found a strong aversion to be the 1st presenter. This result suggests the present bias because almost all subjects selected the first half weeks of alternatives. We also gave subjects a reward option with self control: One class cancelation with 5 days short extensions added to usual class. Most selected day to cancel was surprisingly the last day of alternatives for subjects. This result means they use their choice as a commitment device not to avoid their class. This fact means students use backward induction when they are planning the future. Therefore we can conclude that people actually use backward induction in their planning.
- 敬愛大学・千葉敬愛短期大学の論文
著者
関連論文
- 後悔回避による動学的不整合性は実験において観察されるか?
- 後向き帰納法は現実に使われているか? : 実験による分析
- 不正確さ回避にみる個人の投資戦略の合理性
- 計画的陳腐化がパソコンの価格下落に与える影響の分析 : 仲介者の機能に着目して(個人研究)
- あいまいさ回避についての動学的実験
- リスク態度を含む動学的一致に関するテスト : 報酬デザインがある実験とアンケート実験の比較
- 異時点間の代替性とリスク態度を区別する実験
- 現在バイアスの存在と異時点間のセルフ・コントロール問題を扱うモデルの実験による検証
- Rabinのcalibration theoremを廻る議論と期待効用理論の一般化理論のサーベイ
- IT革命が意思決定に及ぼす影響についての考察
- フィールド実験による谷津干潟の水鳥を中心とした環境評価の試み : 実験手順の詳細および暫定的結果