組織の逸脱行動と責任の帰属 : 国際比較
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
When actors within corporate hierarchies take "actions" on behalf of their organizations, how would the responsibility of the actions be attributed to various elements, such as actors, actors superiors who have the authority of decision making, or organizations? In addition, how would the attribution of responsibility be affected by various circumstantial factors, such as the types of decision making, awareness of possible consequence, and rank within the organizational hierarchy? This study focused on the responsibility of wrongdoing within corporate hierarchies, often described as "corporate crime." Survey of random sample of 600 adults was conducted respectively in Washington, D. C., U. S. A., Tokyo, Japan, and Moscow, Russia. Respondents heard 6 vignettes, 4 basic ones and 2 tentative ones, about wrongdoing in corporate settings. Manipulations include actor's awareness of possible consequence (higt intent vs. low intent), actor's hierarchical position (authority vs. subordinate), and other's influence in the decision making process (independent, collective, ordered by the superior). 4 basic vignettes are automobile safety problem, drug's side effect, news on environmental pollution, and dumping of toxic substance. 2 tentative vignettes are abandoned substance and bribe. Respondents evaluated the responsibility of the actor's, that of actor's, that of actor's superiors who have the authority of decision making, and that of the corporate, as well as the avoidability of possile consequence, seriousness of the consequence, and so forth. Results indicated that the responsibility of the actor for what happened was greatest when the actor was an authority and was acting independently. Hierarchical position and other's influence also interacted in the three cities, such that authorities were excused less for collective decision making or ordered by the superior than were subordinates. Avoidability showed the similar results as that of responsibility, and was larger when the actor was authority than when the actor was subordinate. Responsibility of the organization was high in Japan and the U. S. A. but was low in Russia, while the responsibility of the actor was low in Japan but was high in Russia. Responsibility of the actor's superior and colleagues was higher in the U. S. A. than in Japan. Position of the actor and other's influence also showed the statistical significance in the evaluation of responsibility of superior and colleagues.
- 日本犯罪社会学会の論文
著者
関連論文
- 『NPOによるセミフォーマルな犯罪統制-ボランティア・コミュニティ・コモンズ-』, 小宮信夫著, A5判, 410頁, 3500円, 立花書房, 2001年
- 『警備業の社会学-「安全神話崩壊」の不安とリスクに対するコントロール』, 田中智仁著, A5判, 506頁, 9,975円, 明石書店, 2009年
- 日本人の法意識--アメリカ・中国との対比から (特集2 契約観・訴訟観・法意識の国際比較--21世紀の日本・法曹教育の基礎を作るために(2005年日本私法学会シンポジウム資料))
- 書評 小宮信夫著『NPOによるセミフォーマルな犯罪統制--ボランティア・コミュニティ・コモンズ』〔含 著者より〕
- 『いじめの社会理論 その生態学的秩序の生成と解体』, 内藤朝雄著, B6版, 302頁, 2300円, 柏書房, 2001年
- 犯罪者に対する社会の許容量 : 社会経済指標を中心として
- 組織の逸脱行動と責任の帰属 : 国際比較
- ペンシルバニア大学犯罪学及び刑法研究センターにおける研究の動向について
- 「日・米・中法意識比較研究」調査基本報告書
- 人口減少・高齢化社会における更生保護--実務家からの視点 (少子・高齢化社会における犯罪・非行対策--持続可能な刑事政策を目指して)
- 治安の法社会学から見た都市・地域の将来像
- 人口減少・高齢化社会における更生保護 : 実務家からの視点(少子・高齢化社会における犯罪・非行対策-持続可能な刑事政策を目指して)
- 松原英世著, 『企業活動の刑事規制 抑止機能から意味付与機能へ』, 四六判, 228頁, 3,500円, 信山社, 2000年
- 日本の被害者学と被害者運動の動向 : 人間性の回復へ