マムルーク朝末期の都市社会 : ダマスクスを中心に
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
I.M.Lapidus, an American specialist of Middle Eastern history, argued that the ruling Mamluks' role of combining the 'ulama' (religious and legal scholars) and the common people into one political and social unity, was characteristic of the structure of urban society during the Mamluk dynasty. He called such a system of political and social relations the 'Mamluk regime' and insisted that it worked well even after the rise of the Ottoman dynasty. At the end of the Mamluk era, that is during the time from the accession of Sultan Qa'itbay to the decline of the dynasty (1468-1517), the state suffered from a severe financial crisis due to the decrease of iqta revenue and the increase in the payment of salaries for soldiers and civil officials. Also at that time, impoverished Mamluks often revolted against the Sultan for the fulfilment of these payments. These social instabilities forced the Mamluk state to reform its financial and military regime, which had solely depended on the iqta' system and the Mamluks. This article examines those reform policies and their influence over administration and control of cities in the Mamluk state, in an attempt to reinterpret Lapidus' thesis on the structure of urban society. First, concerning financial policy, Sultan Qa'itbay started taxation on property of citizen and waqf endowment. The state intended it to absorb the accumlated wealth in cities for the betterment of bugetary conditions. For the same purpose the state adopted a policy to take bribes at appointments of officials and to confiscate their property during their tenures of office. It accelerated both a plutocratic tendency among officials and the prevalence of bribary in the administration. This tendency was especially noticeable in the legal administration of cities. The chief judge (qadi al-qudat) appointed many legal officials such as deputy-judges (na'ib), notaries (shahid) and executors (naqib, rasul) and formed them into his own faction (jama'a). He and his party gained profits on the legal system by means of bribary, services charges and so on. In Damascus the governor (na'ib) often levied taxes on its quarters (hara). Especially on expeditions, he conscripted both the arquebusier infantries and their wages from each quarter. He adopted this policy to resolve at once the problems of the financial crisis and the defense of the city. Administrators of each quarter (arif) and the governor's subordinates, such as the majordomo (ustadar) and executive secretary (dawadar), were in charge of collecting taxes. The governor managed to rule the city by embracing these officials and private mercenaries in his faction. As for the commn people, inhabitants of each quarter took remarkable political actions. They almost overwhelmed the military power of the Mamluks in the rebellion of the year 903 / 1497 and in the revolt of 907 / 1501. It was a social group called the zu'r that set up these popular movements. They were outlaws who lived on plunder and assassination. They were employed as infantry and private merconary by the governors, while they dominated markets and stores in their quarters and prevented the governor from taxation in exchange for protection fees. In the cities at the end of the Mamluk era, both the governor, a military-executive, and the chief judge, himself a civil official, formed their own factions (jama'a) and strengthened their domains and exploitation of the people. The commom people coudn't seek shelter anywhere other than under the protection of the zu'r, who built their bases of power in each quarter. The urban society in this period was co structured that various factions and groups were struggling with each other forcibly. Lapidus began his thesis by assuming that the Mamluks, the 'ulama' and the common people were the major strata and actors in the cities. Nevertheless, the author cannot accept his argument without profound qualification. In fact, by the end of the Mamluk era, these three strata had already
- 財団法人史学会の論文
- 1989-01-20
著者
関連論文
- 産業界における「出る杭」論の展開
- Perceptions of Islam and Muslims in Japanese High Schools : Questionnaire Survey and Textbooks(Perception of Islam in Japanese Schools)
- 十九世紀のサーリヒーヤ街区 : 住民の社会経済行動
- 西アジア・北アフリカ : イスラム時代(一九八八年の歴史学界 : 回顧と展望)
- マムルーク朝末期の都市社会 : ダマスクスを中心に
- 中東・イスラム世界にみる法廷の契約と当事者の合意
- 中東イスラーム世界と日本 (彙報 二〇一〇年度春期東洋学講座講演要旨--東洋文庫とアジア(3)東洋文庫は日本のアジア研究をいかにリードしてきたのか)
- 森本芳樹著, 『比較史の道-ヨーロッパ中世から広い世界へ-』, 創文社, 2004年3月, v+265+58頁, 5,985円
- 企画趣旨(学校教育におけるイスラーム)
- Survey of Middle East Studies in Japan : Historical Development, Present State, and Prospectus
- 加藤博著, 『アブー・スィネータ村の醜聞-裁判文書からみたエジプトの村社会-』, 創文社, 1997年11月, 240+23頁, 4,200円
- 19世紀ダマスクスのイスラム法廷文書(2) : サーリヒーヤ街区における社会経済関係
- 訴訟の比較文化史 : カーディーと公証人イスラム法世界の裁判と調停
- 19世紀ダマスクスのイスラム法廷文書(1)-サーリヒーヤ法廷をめぐる人間関係-
- 空間の都市性 : アラブ・イスラーム都市を視る(社会と政治)(都市史研究の方法とひろがり)(都市史)
- イスラ-ム地域研究の発進
- ダマスクスのマドラサとワクフ
- 鈴木董著 『オスマン帝国の権力とエリート』, 東京大学出版会, 一九九三・六刊, A5, 二六〇頁, 四一二〇円
- イスラ-ム都市研究再考 (シリ-ズ:イスラ-ムの都市性)
- マムルーク朝時代のサーリヒーヤ : 街区とウラマー社会
- 研究フォーラム 高校生・大学生の中東・イスラーム理解と世界史教育 (世界史の研究(215))
- 読書案内 イスラームと都市 (世界史の研究(203))
- 比較史のアジア (アジア遊学一〇〇号記念 アジア遊学一〇〇号の提案--これからの研究構想を語る) -- (アジア遊学の未来)
- 彙報 平成15年度秋期東洋学講座講演要旨(現地史料からみるイスラーム世界) 第四七六回 アラブ--都市に生きる人々
- グローバル文化学に関心のある学生はどのような学生か?
- 大学教育とキャリア形成 : 入学時と2年終了時のお茶の水女子大学生の調査から
- 『日本における中東・イスラーム研究文献目録』とデータベース (特集 途上国研究のための研究ツール--新・旧書誌情報を活用する)
- 鈴木秀光・高谷知佳・林真貴子・屋敷二郎編著, 『法の流通-法制史学会60周年記念若手論文集-』, 慈学社出版, 二〇〇九・一二刊, 九二二頁, 九四〇〇円
- 追悼 佐藤次高先生
- 学問と人生 (佐藤次高先生追悼特集)
- 世界史教育における中東とイスラーム
- サーリヒーヤ物語 : ダマスクスのある街区から
- 都市とワクフの諸關係