オスマン朝修史官制度の形成
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
After the beginning of the 18th century, Ottoman historical writing was dominated by official historians ("Vekayi'-nuvis"), who continued to record Ottoman history and were consecutively appointed from the beginning of the 18th century to the end of Ottoman empire. Their style of historical writing is very rare not only under the Ottoman dynasty but also in all the whole of the Islamic world. Regarding the research to date on this subject, not many scholars have examined the careers of "official historians" thoroughly, and consequently regard the process of their formation as static. The purpose of this paper is to reconsider the process of that formation through examining the careers of the first four historians, Na'ima (d.1716), Sefik (d.1715), Rasid (d.1735) and Kucukcelebizade (d.1769). Na'ima was appointed by grand vezir Amcazade Huseyn in order to complete a draft of sarihu'l-Menarzade. Sefik was probably nominated twice, firstly by grand vezir Rami (though this appointment is very doubtful), secondly by grand vezir Sehid 'Ali. Sefik wrote two works, but neither is a normal chronicles and have no relationship the chronicles of Na'ima and Rasid. Rasid was firstly appointed by Sehid 'Ali in order to chronicle the reign of Sultan Ahmed III in 1714/5. Reappointed by Nevsehirli Ibrahim in 1717,Rasid was ordered to continue his work. But soon after that, Nevsehirli changed his order from recording the reign of Sultan Ahmed III to continuing the chronicle of Na'ima. This change is important because continuous chronicling of Ottoman history began from this time. Kucukcelebizade became a successor to Rasid and began to write from the end of Rasid's chronicle in 1723,after which continuous chronicling and appointment of official historians was normalized. In the Ottoman empire, there were many "temporary official historians" appointed by Sultans or influential persons before the "continuous official historians" i.e.vekayi'-nuvis. For example, we can identify Nergisi, Nulhimi and Abdi. Of course they were officially appointed, but never composed continuous chronicles or were appointed consecutively. The author considers the appointments of Na'ima, Sefik and Rasid (until Nevsehirli's changing his order) as "temporary". "Continuous official historians" only appeared after Nevsehirli changed his order in 1717. The result of this survey shows that a change from "temporary official historian" to "continuous official historian" happened around so-called "Tulip era" (1718-1730). This process of a formation of the official historians may parallel the development of the bureaucracy from the 17th century on.
- 公益財団法人史学会の論文
- 2002-01-20
著者
関連論文
- 古典期オスマン帝国における正統の創造--オグズ伝承の分析から
- 近代オスマン帝国における「王家の起源」批判--アフメト・ミドハト『詳説近代史』の分析から (特集 「由緒」の比較史--出自をめぐる共同体の歴史実践(2))
- トルコ共和国公定歴史学における「過去」の再構成--高校用教科書『歴史』(1931年刊)の位置づけ (特集 オスマン帝国史の諸問題) -- (「西洋化」改革から共和国へ)
- オスマン朝における歴史叙述のなかのモンゴル像
- オスマン朝修史官の叙法
- 菅原睦・太田かおり訳, 『デデ・コルクトの書 アナトリアの英雄物語集』(東洋文庫 720), 平凡社, 二〇〇三・一〇刊, 全書版, 三七五頁, 三〇〇〇円
- 合同部会 田中創 ローマ帝政後期の法と実践 櫻井康人 12世紀エルサレム王国におけるフランク人とムスリムの政治的コミュニケーション 山口昭彦 サファヴィー朝(1501-1722)とクルド系諸部族 平田和重 16世紀メキシコにおける先住民の精神的征服 岩井淳 17世紀ブリテンの複合国家と他者認識 (2011年度歴史学研究会大会報告批判)
- 鈴木薫著, 『オスマン帝国とイスラム世界』, 東京大学出版会, 一九九七・八刊, A5, 二四〇頁, 四八〇〇円
- オスマン朝におけるカユ裔の正統化 : オグズ伝承の分析を通じて(東洋史部会,第一〇四回史学会大会報告)
- オスマン朝修史官制度の形成
- 新井政美著, 『トルコ近現代史-イスラム国家から国民国家へ-』, みすず書房, 二〇〇一・四刊, 四六, 三五六頁, 四二〇〇円
- オスマン朝修史官の形成と性格 : ナイーマーからキュチュクチェレビザーデまで、任官の経過と叙述の性格の検討(第九八回史学会大会報告記事)
- 古典期オスマン朝歴史叙述における起源論と系譜意識(中東研究博士論文要旨)
- 古典期オスマン朝史書に見えるセルジューク朝との系譜意識
- 研究機関紹介 トルコ宗教財団イスラーム研究センター(ISAM)
- 批評と紹介 ヒース・W・ローリー著『初期オスマン国家の性質』
- 批評と紹介 ショレフ・A・クイン著『シャー・アッバース治世の歴史叙述 サファヴィー朝年代記におけるイデオロギー、模倣、正当性』