<誌上シンポジウム>意見-教育社会学的視角について
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
1. The writer considers this symposium to be an attempt to find out a new methodology for the study of family in the sociology of education. He is rather skeptical if there are any educational-sociological methods as such. Any method, he thinks, can be educational-sociological so far as it is adopted by the researcher with a view to contributing to the improvement of education through a sociological study. 2. The sociology of education is indeed a sociological study of educational phenomena, and should be approached as objectively as possible that is, free from any dogmatic creeds or prejudices. But it is also a study of education by a sociological researcher with a clear awareness of his final contribution to the improvement of educational poblems. He is requested to have a perspective in mind in which he connects his present study with the historical realities of education, although this never means, that his study should be made with a sense of hasty applicability. The socializing functions of the family are an important area of education, but a mere sociological study of it does not prove educational-sociological unless the researcher is fully conscious of this kind of perspective. 3. In the correlational method so common in sociological studies, the researcher, who tries to find a possible relationship between, for example, a child-rearing practice and the occupation of the family, is tempted to treat these variables separately as if they were two different items. But the truth is that he is only analyzing one and the same social entity, the social class, in terms of its two cultural aspects. The wholeness is given first, the reality is presented before him undivided, and the researcher is to analyze it from various aspects. In such an analysis, qualitative data are as important as the quantitative. This also suggests that the historical realities of education do not exist apart from the realm of sociological studies, and that a researcher in the sociology of education is requested to start his study with an analysis of this given entity rather than to make a sociological study and then try to connect it with educational needs.
- 日本教育社会学会の論文
- 1966-10-10
著者
関連論文
- 中小企業集団の構造 : 名古屋市西区菓子屋街の場合
- 苅谷 剛彦 著, 『大衆教育社会のゆくえ : 学歴主義と平等神話の戦後史』, 新書判, 226頁, 720円, 中央公論社
- 高校入試体制と中学生の対応 (「高校・大学入試改革と青年の進路」(教育改革をめぐる公開シンポジウム-5-))
- 学歴主義からの脱却(第26回大会講演)
- 教員養成の争点と生涯教育
- 学歴社会の立場から : 学校機能の限定と集中へ(シンポジウム 義務教育後教育体系の構想)
- 学歴社会における学校の機能(課題研究 I 地域と学校の機能)
- 学校群における格差形成のメカニズム
- 学歴意識の構造
- 麻生 誠編, 「教育社会学」, 社会学講座 第一〇巻, A5判, 二七八頁, 東京大学出版会
- 学区の再編成
- テレビ視聴からみた家庭教育の構造
- 母親の教育意識の構造
- 母親の職業活動と子どもの適応
- 意見-教育社会学的視角について
- II 現代における家庭教育
- 地域の変貌とモラル
- 中学生の学校差観
- 501 名古屋市におけるじゆく教育の実態と問題点
- 130 生徒の相貌の追求 : 方法論的試み
- 9. 農民の教育意識と階層
- 二、生徒集団における階級的要内について(続) (第五回 日本教育社会学会 大会研究発表要項)
- 2. 生徒集団における階級的要因について(続)(第一部会)