Workers' Decisions to Comply : A Comparison of the Perceived Threats of Managerial Sanctions, Embarrassment and Shame in Japan and the United States
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
Drawing on the extended deterrence model, we develop a rationale for predicting that Japanese employees, compared to American employees, perceive greater threats of managerial sanctions, embarrassment, and shame for noncompliant behavior. In the research reported here, parallel measures are created of the perceived threats of each punishment for three forms of productive deviance (taking a long lunch or break, coming to work late or leaving early, and using sick leave). The cultural differences in perceived levels of these threats for the rule violations are then examined in merged samples of employees in Japanese and U.S. university hospitals. Consistent with the prediction, threats of all three sanctions are perceived to be higher among Japanese employees than American employees.
- 名古屋商科大学の論文
著者
関連論文
- Punishment for Noncompliance and Reward for Compliance : A Comparison of Japanese and American Workers
- Workers' Decisions to Comply : A Comparison of the Perceived Threats of Managerial Sanctions, Embarrassment and Shame in Japan and the United States
- Gender and Noncompliance with Workplace Rules in Japan : The Contributions of Managerial Sanctions, Embarrassment, and Shame