Gender and Noncompliance with Workplace Rules in Japan : The Contributions of Managerial Sanctions, Embarrassment, and Shame
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
According to Grasmick's extended model of deterrence, in addition to formal punishments imposed by managerial authorities, employees contemplating rule violation are assumed to take into account the certainty and severity of two other types of punishment-socially-imposed embarrassment and self-imposed shame. All three are proposed to be deterrents to employee noncompliance with organizational rules. The present study uses this theory to account for gender differences in noncompliance with organizational rules (i.e., workplace deviance) among hospital workers in japan. Among the workers in the Japanese sample, females are more compliant with workplace rules than are their male coworkers. The greater compliance among females is attributable to a significant extent to the greater perceived threat of shame among females. The analysis reveals an anomaly-that age is not strongly related to noncompliance in the sample of Japanese employees-and offers suggestions for future research on the role of culture in shaping the age-deviance relationship.
- 名古屋商科大学の論文
- 2002-03-01
著者
関連論文
- Punishment for Noncompliance and Reward for Compliance : A Comparison of Japanese and American Workers
- Workers' Decisions to Comply : A Comparison of the Perceived Threats of Managerial Sanctions, Embarrassment and Shame in Japan and the United States
- Gender and Noncompliance with Workplace Rules in Japan : The Contributions of Managerial Sanctions, Embarrassment, and Shame