Punishment for Noncompliance and Reward for Compliance : A Comparison of Japanese and American Workers
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
In a recent series of articles, Kobayashi and Grasmick have applied an extended model of deterrence and rational decision-making to a comparative study of Japanese and American workers' violation of warkplace rules. These previous studies draw from control theory in the sociological study of deviance and focus on the costs of noncompliance. The present paper, building on differential association/social learning theory, adds a new dimension - the rewards of compliance - to this comparative project. In workplace settings, decisions by workers to comply or not comply with rules are based on perceptions of punishment associated with noncompliance and on perceptions of rewards associated with compliance. A review of the literature on socialization in Japan compared to the United States leads to two hypotheses : (1)Japanese workers, compared to their American counterparts, perceive greater punishment for noncompliance, and (2)Japanese workers, compared to their American counterparts, perceive lower rewards for compliance. Analysis of survey data collected from hospital employees in Japan and in the United States provides strong support for both hypotheses.
- 名古屋商科大学の論文
- 2003-03-01
著者
関連論文
- Punishment for Noncompliance and Reward for Compliance : A Comparison of Japanese and American Workers
- Workers' Decisions to Comply : A Comparison of the Perceived Threats of Managerial Sanctions, Embarrassment and Shame in Japan and the United States
- Gender and Noncompliance with Workplace Rules in Japan : The Contributions of Managerial Sanctions, Embarrassment, and Shame