「インドネシア」の見方 : 行政空間の認識とその変容 (<特集>インドネシ ア国民の形成 : 故土屋健治教授を偲んで)

スポンサーリンク

概要

• 論文の詳細を見る

• この論文は国立情報学研究所の学術雑誌公開支援事業により電子化されました。This paper compares different conceptualizations of administrative space in the late colonial period and the New Order and attempts to understand the significance of this difference. Specifically, it compares the listing order of the provinces or their colonial equivalents in such government documents as Regeeringsalmanak, Statistical Pocketbook of Indonesia, and Statistical Yearbook of Indonesia. First, the paper reviews indigenous conceptualization of space in pre-colonial Sumatra and then discusses changes in the ordering of Sumatran residencies between the early 1930s and after 1939. During the 1930s, the Sumatran residencies seem to have been listed in the order in which they had come under direct Dutch control. From 1939,they began to be listed from the northern to the southern end of the island. The "provinces" of the colony as a whole were listed more or less in clockwise order during the late colonial period, starting from "Java and Madura, " moving to Sumatra, then to Borneo, Celebes, Manado, Molukken, Timor, "Bali and Lombok" and implicitly ending back at "Java and Madura, " thereby closing the imaginary circle of listing. The clockwise, circular listing of provinces highlights the central importance of Java in the Netherlands Indies. The post-independence listing of provinces during the 1950s and 1960s resembles the colonial one. A major and critical difference, however, is observed in eastern Indonesia. The post-independence listing of provinces in this area does not follow the clockwise movement. Rather, it runs from Bali to Nusa Tunggara, and from Maluku to New Guinea, thus highlighting the eastern border areas, the areas of contention after independence. A completely different mode of listing of provinces was established by the late 1970s. It can been seen in Statistical Yearbook of Indonesia 1976 published in 1978. Interestingly, 1976 is the year when the geographical expanse of the Republic of Indonesia was finally bounded according to the wishes of Indonesian political and military leaders, as East Timor was formally incorporated into the republic in this year. We may also assume that after putting its house in order, so to speak, in Java in the late 1960s and during the first Five Year Plan, the Suharto regime turned its attention increasingly to the whole of Indonesia from the mid-1970s, for which it supposedly needed a well-organized view of the entire country. In the new mode of listing, which is here called the bird's-eye view of Indonesia, the provinces are basically listed in two strokes from west to east : the first from Sumatra to Java, Bali, Nusa Tunggara and East Timor : the second from Kalimantan to Sulawesi, Maluku, and Irian Jaya. The bird's-eye view projects an image of a homogenenous Indonesian space which consists of twenty-seven provinces of presumably equal political standing. The paper further examines some of the New Order's cultural and educational policies during the 1970s and 1980s and concludes that the provinces are now filled with their respective regional cultures (kebudayaan daerah), regional histories of independence struggle (sejarah perjuangan daerah), and so on. The provinces are no longer simply administrative spaces on the map. They can be experienced, studied, identified and identified with, and even emulated in the case of regional architectural styles and wedding costumes. As the provinces are considered politically equal in the homogeneous space of Indonesia, the regional cultures and regional ethnic groups which represent the provinces are also considered equal. For example, they are treated "equally" in the Taman Mini Indonesia Indah or "Beautiful Indonesia" in-Miniature Park. Suharto's New Order was born after Indonesia had gone through a number of acute conflicts associated with regionalism (daerahisme) and ethnic rivalry (sukuisme). Given this background, the bird's-eye view of Indonesia is remarkably suited to promoting the image and ideology of equality among the

著者

• 加藤 剛

  京都大学東南アジア研究センター

• 加藤 剛

  龍谷大学社会学部

• 加藤 剛

  京都大学大学院アジア・アフリカ地域研究研究科

関連論文

• 「インドネシア」の見方 : 行政空間の認識とその変容 (インドネシ ア国民の形成 : 故土屋健治教授を偲んで)
• 南西諸島におけるサキシマスオウノキの分布とハビタット特性
• 開発と革命の語られ方 : インドネシアの事例から(開発の記憶 : 序にかえて)
• スマトラの村の20世紀--地域の歴史を描く (特集 地域研究の新地平)
• Henk Schulte Nordholt, ed. Outward Appearances: Dressing State and Society in Indonesia. Koninklijk Instituut voor Taal-, Land- en Volenkunde Proceedings 4. Leiden: KITLV, 1997, viii+371p.
• 富士山のスバルライン開設に伴う森林植生の破壊と回復 : 30年後の実態
• 西表島・石垣島の谷部に生育するサキシマスオウノキ林の構造について
• 空を飛ぶ患者
• オランダ領東インド植民地都市の心象風景:初期バレ・プスタカ小説を手がかりと して(植民地都市の社会史 : オランダ領東インドの事例)
• 編者のことば(植民地都市の社会史 : オランダ領東インドの事例)
• Dynamics of the Frontier World in Insular Southeast Asia: An Overview(Studies on the Dynamics of the Frontier World in Insular Southeast Asia)
• The Emergence of Abandoned Paddy Fields in Negeri Sembilan,Malaysia
• When Rubber Came: The Negeri Sembilan Experience
• マレー農村にて
• Agricultural Rituals and Rice Cultivation in Negeri Sembilan : A Reconstruction from Oral History(Socio-Economic Change and Cultural Transformation in Rural Malaysia : A Preliminary Research Report)
• Editors' Introduction(Socio-Economic Change and Cultural Transformation in Rural Malaysia : A Preliminary Research Report)
• Shamsul A.B, From British to Bumiputera Rule : Local Polities and Rural Development in Peninsular Malaysia, Singapore : Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, 1986, 282p.
• インドネシアの都市にみる種族結合 : ネットワークと同郷会(インドネシアの都市人類学)
• 都市と移住民 : ジャカルタ在住ミナンカバウの事例(東南アジアにおける「都市」の諸様相)
• 社会面記事にみるジャカルタ
• 盾と矛? : ミナンカバウ社会にみるイスラームと母系制の関係について(故水野浩一教授を偲んで)
• インドネシアの政治過程と地域アイデンティティのゆらぎ : リアウ州クアンタン地方の事例(パネル3「島嶼部東南アジアの開発過程と境域-アイデンティティの再構築をめぐって-」,第85回研究大会報告)
• 問題提起:島嶼部三ヵ国の開発政策にみるの位置づけ(パネル3「島嶼部東南アジアの開発過程と境域-アイデンティティの再構築をめぐって-」,第85回研究大会報告)

もっと見る 閉じる

スポンサーリンク