Evaluation of Each Series of Lectures Using 10 Questions at the Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
Every year since 2001 each series of lectures at the Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine has been evaluated using 10 questions with classification into five grades. In this study, the evaluation scores for 2001 and 2002 were compared and analyzed statistically. The average score for all subjects increased by 0.15 point in 2002. The average scores for liberal arts and clinical medicine increased 0.18 and 0.27 point, respectively, whereas the score for basic medicine increased 0.03 point, suggesting improvements with the efforts of each lecturer. The standard deviations of the scores for 8 questions (2 questions on examinations were omitted) were smaller for clinical medicine than for liberal arts and basic medicine. Continuous formative evaluation of each series of lectures and analysis of the results are needed to improve teaching skills.
- 日本医学教育学会の論文
日本医学教育学会 | 論文
- 従来型カリキュラムへのPBLテュートリアル導入が臨床実習にもたらした効果
- 医学部学生に対する二次救命処置教育 : シミュレーション訓練を取り入れた二次救命処置教育プログラムの作成
- 学生による臨床実習指導医評価法の検討
- 診療参加型臨床実習医学生における生命倫理についての意識調査
- 米国における医療(患者)安全教育の現状