Two Different Aspects of Social Order:From the Participant's View
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
We can draw distinction between the two different aspects of social order, ‹rule› on the one hand, ‹regularity› on the other. ‹Rule› is an order of which the participants of a society are aware. With relation to ‹rule› each bodily movement of the participants is understood as intentional "action", since they are able to choose whether to obey or disobey to this ‹rule›. Compared to this, ‹regularity› is another form of order. It is utterly unknown by the participants themselves, but can be known by the strangers to this society as nothing else than what is indicated by the existence of factual bodily movements of the participants. These bodily movements are not usually understood as intentional or chosen "actions." In the case of ‹regularity›, there exists no difference between social order itself and the whole of individual bodily movements. Accordingly, for we as participants to recognize this ‹regularity›, we have to differentiate it from our own bodily movements, and establish ‹rule› purposefully. This paper examines the socio-logical process of transformation of habitual ‹regularity› to coercive ‹rule› by making the concept of "action" as catalyst.
- 日本社会学会の論文
日本社会学会 | 論文
- Pursuing the Sociological Study of Environmental Governance in Japan : An Introduction to the Special Issue ( Environmental Governance in Japan)
- 市民調査という可能性:調査の主体と方法を組み直す(社会調査:その困難をこえて)
- 久富善之編著『豊かさの底辺に生きる』
- 藤田弘夫著『都市と権力 : 飢餓と飽食の歴史学』
- わが国における労働・産業社会学形成過程に関する一考察 ( 戦前の日本社会学)