Sociological Points of View on the Concept of Structure

概要

論文の詳細を見る
The purpose of this paper is to compare three concepts of social structure which have been designed by A.R. Radcliffe-Brown, Claude Lévi-Strauss, and Georges Gurvitch.<BR>Radcliffe-Brown has defined social structure as "the network of actually existing relations", taking an empirical position to see social reality on its surface. In contrast to this view, Lévi-Strauss has conceived of structure as a model, the formal property of which can be compared independently of its elements ; that is, he attempts to analyse structure at deeper level than empirical reality. However, these views run to extremes ; the former being too empirical and the latter too abstruct transcending the socio-cultural level.<BR>The real sociological standpoint should be that of empiricoideal or concrete-abstract as Gurvitch has assumed. Critisizing that Radcliffe-Brown's position is superficial and that of Lévi-Strauss is systematic but not holistic, Gurvitch emphasizes the meaning of social whole itself besides the interaction of social elements. And he attempts to analyse the social reality in a dynamic way, saying that the essence must be seeked in its movement and depth.<BR>Accepting Gurvitch's basic stand, I suggests in these paper that structure must be conceived as a totality of both culturally and socially constructed structures.
日本社会学会の論文