継続調査でみる原子力発電に対する世論<br/>過去30年と福島第一原子力発電所事故後の変化
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
In this study, the results of surveys conducted over the past 30 years were analyzed. The surveys include continuous opinion polls conducted by seven organizations, those conducted by eight news media one year after the Fukushima Daiichi accident, and those conducted by INSS fourteen times from 1993 to December 2011. The results were as follows: (1) Negative opinions toward nuclear power generation (NPG) suggesting "abolition or reduction", which used to be 20-30% over the past 30 years, increased to 70% from four to six months after the accident, when there was also much news about renewable energy. (2) Even after the accident, 60% regarded NPG as "inevitable", but many opposed future replacement or new construction of NPG facilities. (3) After the accident, recognition of the usefulness of NPG and concerns about electric power shortages in the near future remained unchanged, while anxiety and distrust toward NPG increased significantly. When considering power generation options, people now tend to focus on accident risks. (4) Nevertheless, people are neither aware of various possible problems caused by reducing NPG nor willing to accept a significant increase in electricity rate caused by the shift to renewable energy.
著者
関連論文
- 回答変動の検討 : 回答のゆれ
- 意識調査における回答変動の検討 : 実質的変化と回答のゆれの分離
- エリア・サンプリングの実践的検討 : INSS'07調査における「地図DB法」と「現地積上法」の比較
- 継続調査でみる原子力発電に対する世論過去30年と福島第一原子力発電所事故後の変化