Difference of Clinical Assessment of Blood Alkaline Phosphatase between Different Substrates
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
Intensive efforts for the standardization of enzyme assay were carried out in many laboratories, and these efforts were resolved themselves into two types of approaches for standardization. One of them is studies of kinetical properties of the enzymes. Another is studies of the relation between enzyme assay conditions and more precise clinical assessment. The first type of approaches were extensively studied in many countries, and GSCC1) and SSCC2) recommended the suitable assay condition for the several enzymes from this point of views. Recently we reported the relation between substrates and some kinetical properties of blood alkaline phosphatases (Al-P)3). In this report, differences of clinical assessment of Al-P in different substrate systems, and the differences of clinical assessment in combination between leucine amino peptidase (LAP) and Al-P in different measuring systems were studied.<BR>Electrophoretically identified three types of sera, bone, hepatic and placental type dominant sera, were used in our experiments.<BR>The assay conditions of Al-P, LAP and Al-P isoenzymes were summarized in TABLE I.<BR>Fig. 1-a shows correlation of Al-P between PP-Carb and PNPP-DEA methods. The regression line with placental type Al-P was different from other sources of Al-P. This fact suggests that the placental type Al-P could be separated from the others by projecting new calculated Z axis. F or this reason, the ratio of Al-P measured with PP-Carb versus Al-P measured with PNPP-DEA were calculated and plotted in Fig. 2-a. From this ratio, placental type Al-P is significantly separated from the others statistically. Fig. 1-b shows correlation of Al-P between PP-Carb and PNPP-Ame method. Three regression lines obtained from the different sources of Al-P were almost identical. The ratio of Al-P measured with PP-Carb and with PNPP-Ame method were also calculated and plotted in Fig. 2-b. From this ratio, there was no difference among the three types of Al-P. So clinical appreciation of Al-P were almost same in this two methods.<BR>For the purpose of elucidating the relation between enzyme assay condition and clinical
- Japan Society of Clinical Chemistryの論文
著者
関連論文
- Methylcobalaminとりん脂質 : 特にPhosphatidylethanolamineのメチル化によるPhosphatidylcholine : 合成経路の意義
- ビタミンB_および葉酸欠乏食飼育シロネズミの脊髄神経細胞内RNA・DNAの動態(予報)
- 120. 術後高アミラーゼ血症の検討(第6回日本消化器外科学会大会)
- Laboratory Diagnosis
- 23臨床生化学分析
- 13 臨床生化学分析
- An Approach for Standardization of Enzyme Determinations through Quality Control Surveys
- Initial Rate Spectrophotometric Analysis of Serum Alkaline-phosphatase and Leucine-aminopeptidase
- Problems of Reagent Systems in Reaction Rate Analysis of Enzyme
- Difference of Clinical Assessment of Blood Alkaline Phosphatase between Different Substrates
- Properties of Abnormal Amylascs in Human Sera
- Modifications of Serum Lactic Dehydrogenase Isoenzymes
- Applications of Reaction Rate Analysis on Chemical Determinations in Clinical Laboratory
- Modification of human amylase isoenzymes by plasmin-like proteolytic activity
- Fluorescence Initial Reaction Rate Analysis of Serum Alkaline phosphatase and Leucine aminopeptidase