日本語聴解テストにおいて選択肢提示形式が解答過程に与える影響 : 発話思考法を用いて
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
This article reports findings from retrospective verbal reports of test-takers. Data included retrospective protocols of 9 examinees on 24 listening comprehension items. Three kinds of test forms were designed for the experiment. These tests are different from each other in styles of presenting multiple-choice options. 3 examinees took a listening test consisting of items whose multiple-choice options were presented in written format, 3 examinees took a test consisting of items whose options were presented in recorded format, and 3 examinees took a test.consisting of items whose options were presented in written format after playing dialogue recorded. Research questions were as follows: (i) why items with written options were less difficult than items with recorded ones in the case of items that test-takers can get an answer by scanning a part of a dialogue; and (ii) whether any other differences of retrospective verbal reports are observed between items with written options and items with recorded ones. The results of the analysis were as follows: (i) test-takers of a test consisting of items with recorded options could not get a keyword for an answer because a keyword was an unfamiliar word or they could not assume what an answer was like after listening to a question, although test-takers of a test consisting of items with written options could get correctly a keyword, or scan a part of a dialogue; (ii) test-takers of a test consisting of items with recorded options sometimes forgot what options were, therefore chose an wrong answer although they understood correctly; and (iii) test-takers of a test consisting of items with written options had difficulty to read multiple choices of complicated sentences during listening.
- 日本言語テスト学会の論文
- 2006-10-20