官民連携による社会教育サービス供給のための「品質管理」に関する考察 : 図書館PFI事業の日英事例比較を通して(III 研究報告)
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
The purpose of this paper aims to clarify the possibility of process to maintain the quality of administration as to the social education. A partnership of private enterprise with the public sector could bring the successful results in both hardware as well as the contents of social education. On the way of my study, the focus is put on the process of innovating the public library with the project of Private Finance Initiative (PFI). Some examples in Japan and in UK are examined in this paper. The first case is Hackney Technology & Learning Centre in London, which shows a good relation particularly between the leading and its subcontract private company for the building maintenance. The second example is Patcham Library and Community Centre, Brighton which has kept close contact to school around. The last one is the first attempted plan for the public library (Kuwana Media Live), which is managed mainly be the private company through PFI project. The advantages of such partnership could be understood from three points of view. Firstly, it is the most effective process to decrease the cost of services, and at the same time it would be useful to maintain the quality of services. Thirdly, some proposals or useful idea presented by private company can be refered while the public sector provides necessary service. The administrative authority concerning social education should be responsible to accomplish these targets anytime.The most important aspect of the function of public sector with a close cooperation with private company is the control of the quality of necessary services and in such process fixing the field of the competence should have the first priority and also how the public sector effectively can supervise the performance of private enterprise must affect such quality of services. The process of this function can be classified into five stages, fixing the target among a lot of requests, secondly, choosing the sort of task, thirdly, Monitoring, fourthly, supplemental process to fill the shortage of services and finally to check the effects of coordination. Some conclusion can be drawn as follows. The public authority is recommended to reduce its competence to the minimum when it involves fixing target, because some useful proposal could be spoiled if the power of authority would strong. On the contrary, it would be recommended to commit to the stage of choosing the task which relates the quality of service very closely. Moreover, public authority is expected to check the process of actual performance and the contents of services regularly. Such standing points of view could contribute for the current social educational administration in Japan.
- 日本教育行政学会の論文
- 2005-10-14