教育における国家の責任の史的展開 : テーマ設定の趣旨と討議の総括(まとめ,教育における国家の責任の史的展開,課題研究1,IV 課題研究)
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
1. The purpose of thesis and the prospects for next yesr's sessions For a long time since the Second World War, the Ministry of Education (Monbusho) has maintained its strong administrative and fiscal power over the local educational authorities (the prefectural and municipal Boards of Education) and the schools. But from the mid-1980,more especially the mid-1990, the political tendencies in educational administration toward the decentralization and delegulation are becoming strongly year by year. The roles and responsibilities of the State (central government) will be changed to more reduced or smaller than now. We have to analyze it and propose what and how the responsibility of the State should be in the 21st. century. The reports and discussions in annual conferences about the above thesis begin in 1999 and will last into 2001. The theme of next year's conference session is the comparative studies of foreign cases. In the last year session in 2001, we will deal with how the Nation-state's responsibility for school educational should be in the present and the future in Japan and further examine the problems of it. This session, the first year, focuses the analysis of historical developement of Japanese State's responsibility for school education; that is, how the State has controled and regulated the national standard curriculum or textbooks, school governance system, educational finance system, and what purposes those policies had. 2. Summary of three reports and presentations In this year's conference, three reports were done to show and realize the historical developments of education policies and circumstances. Prof. Mikami insisted that the enactment of Private School Promotion Subsidy Law and Special Training School Law in 1975 was the very important turning point in the financial policy on public education. And he tried to persuade us the necessity of studying in the relationship between the educational administration policy and the meaning of Article 89 of the Constitution. Prof. Yamaguchi, on his report "the change of national responsibility in a curriculum policy", concluded that the framework of the curriculum control by the central government was established in 1963, and will not be changed from now on without the drastic change in the concept of "public education" in the future. Prof. Ojima gave an overview of school administration policies in postwar years and proposed that in "the Third Reform-Period" since 1980s each school would have to show its originality in school management. 3. Summary of the discussions After the above three presentations, we took some questions and heard opinions from the participants in this session. Prof. Mikimi's insistence had a great impact on many participants, but it was accepted with approval in general. There were some opinions that the structure and meaning of the concepts of "State responsibility" for education should be more clearly and accurately.
- 日本教育行政学会の論文
- 2000-10-13
著者
関連論文
- 子ども人口減少期における教員養成及び教育学部問題 : かわるカリキュラムと教員養成への期待
- 学校現場での実践性を志向する教育経営学研究のレビュー
- 保護者と教師のコンフリクト : 対等にモノが言える時代の中で(教育政治の諸相,I 年報フォーラム)
- 市川昭午著, 『教育基本法を考える-心を法律で律すべきか』, 教育開発研究所, 2003年, 198頁
- 教育における国家の責任の史的展開 : テーマ設定の趣旨と討議の総括(まとめ,教育における国家の責任の史的展開,課題研究1,IV 課題研究)