カリキュラム政策における「国家の責任」の変遷(発表・2,教育における国家の責任の史的展開,課題研究1,IV 課題研究)

スポンサーリンク

概要

• 論文の詳細を見る

• 1. Introduction From the Meiji time to today, education was always one of the national maximum concerns. It shows that the state has very strong concern in the contents of the public education centering on a school-education system. The purpose of this announcement is by referring to deployment of textbook administration to consider the national participation to the educational contents. 2. National Participation to Education before World War II It is well known that the national participation to the educational contents is being gradually strengthened for thought control of people in the maintenance process of the Meiji state. The changes of a textbook system in prewar days show that the textbook system was used as a very effective policy for the national participation to a curriculum. 3. National Participation to Education in Postwar Period The so-called 1955 regime of Japanese politics was the very unbalanced situation in the determination structure of an educational policy. That is, the "Liberal Democratic Party-Ministry of Education partnership" which is in a predominant position politically has monopolized decision of an educational policy. By this, the "Japan Teachers Union-Socialist Party partnership" will be gradually driven into a plight by the slogan "educational political neutrality." Consequently, national participation to the educational contents was performed powerfully in order to attain strengthening of nationalism, and the talented person cultivation for economic growth. Especially the national participation to the educational contents has the feature in the point performed in two forms of textbook control and regulation of curriculum organization. When it looks back upon textbook administration of Japan after the war, it turns out that the fundamental framework of the national control to a textbook is completed in the mid-1960s. 4. Conclusion Generally, it is supposed that it is the time of the post 1955 regime of Japanese politics now. And there is observation that the form of the national participation to education will also change in connection with today's political / social structural change. However, the political subject of nationalism strengthening and the talented person cultivation for economic growth has been thought as important actually more than at the former. In this meaning, it can be said that there is no change of "public education" concept in Japan. Therefore, the framework of the national participation to the educational contents will be fundamentally eternal under the post 1955 regime of Japanese politics until "public education" concept changes. That is, though "decentralization" and "deregulation" are pursued in the domain of other educational administration, it is thought that it is unrelated to the national control to the educational contents.

• 日本教育行政学会の論文
• 2000-10-13

著者

• 山口 拓史

  名古屋大学

関連論文

• 国立大学における自校史教育の意義 : 名古屋大学を事例として
• 「新制大学院」制度史研究序論
• CI&E高等教育顧問イールズ関連資料メモ : 名古屋大学との関連を中心に
• 「名古屋大学史資料室利用規程」制定の取り組み
• 『名古屋大学学報』の変遷過程
• 専任編集室員としての「自負」(五十年史編纂を終えて)
• 大学文書資料室と法人文書管理支援 : シームレス型記録管理の試み
• カリキュラム政策における「国家の責任」の変遷(発表・2,教育における国家の責任の史的展開,課題研究1,IV 課題研究)

スポンサーリンク