関税定率法二一条一項三号判決と教科書判決との関連性 : 税関長の検査、文部大臣の検定、検閲の概念(V 研究報告)
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
The plaintiff wrote the textbook on Japanese history and made an application for an official approval to the Minister of Education. But his textbook failed in the official approval. There-upon, he presnted the minister's administrative disposition to the court as the minister's official approval corresponded to a censorship. Of course, the Minister of Education maintained that officicial approval did not correspond to a censorship. Since then. the plaintiff has been disputting against the Minister of Education in court of law over 24 years. At that time, someone was by chance disputing in another court of law as it was a censorship that the Superintendent of Customs inspecting freights by Arts. 67 of the Customs Law forbade an importer to import freights in agreement with Item 3 of Par. 1 of Arts. 21 of the Customs Tariff Law. However, the non-censorship discussion in two court had no common feature, what is more, the parties concerned in two court that is, the tariffs, the defendants, and the judges took no interest in another non-censorship discussion. But in Grand Bench, the judges of the Supreme Court adopted the non-censorship discussion which the Minister of Education had stated in the textbook trial, so as to declare that Item 3 of Par. 1 of Arts. 21 of the Customs Tariff Law did not correspond to a censorship and a violation of the constitution. I believe that the Supreme Court decided a united view with regard to a censorship. For example, the non-censorship discussion of the Supreme Court was adopted by the Tokyo Hight Court in the textbook trial after two years.
- 日本教育行政学会の論文
- 1987-09-30
著者
関連論文
- 判例研究 児童・生徒の自殺と教員の指導の視点
- 教員の私生活と市民意識 : 性別からみて,徳島県にて (其のIII)
- 佐藤全著, 『親の教育義務と権利』(VI 書評)
- 教員の個人生活等と政治的行為について : 東京都と四国の教員の意識の比較 (実態調査報告・其のII)
- 保護者と教員の懇談の必要性とその内容のあり方 : 学校事故に関して : 判例研究
- 放課後における「いじめ」や「けんか」と教員の指導責任 : 保育園から大学まで : 判例研究
- 関税定率法二一条一項三号判決と教科書判決との関連性 : 税関長の検査、文部大臣の検定、検閲の概念(V 研究報告)