現実意図主義の暇疵
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
After "The Intentional Fallacy" (1946/54) by W. K. Wimsatt Jr. and M. Beardsley, the role of the artist's intention in the interpretation of artwork has been one of the central topics in analytical aesthetics. Recently, this issue has been mainly debated between moderate actual (MAI) and hypothetical intentionalism (HI). In this paper, I demonstrate some difficulties of MAI, comparing it with HI. First, I survey Carroll's version of MAI and point out its main arguments: accessibility to "actual intention" and the reliance on private documents. I examine them and show that the discrimination of MAI from HI is unclear. Additionally, I insist that, against Hans Maes' arguments, MAI has no advantages in interpreting contemporary art, because MAT overlooks the distinction between "semantic" and "categorial" intention, which Levinson draws. Since contemporary art employs diverse materials which have no code to mean something, semantic intention cannot play any role in making such artwork. Instead, categorial intention is the precondition for making it art and tells us how it is to be conceived or approached. Through this examination, I argue that there is no reason to maintain MAT, at least in Carroll's version.
- 2012-12-31
著者
関連論文
- インスタレーション・アートの歴史化の(不)可能性 : ミニマリズムにおける脱歴史の後に
- 自律性から関係性へ : インスタレーション・アートにおける観客の身体性
- 自律性から関係性へ : インスタレーション・アートにおける観客と作品との交叉(第五十八回美学会全国大会発表要旨)
- 山田忠彰・小田部胤久編, 『デザインのオントロギー-倫理学と美学の交響-』, ナカニシヤ出版, 二〇〇七年, xiii+二八七頁
- ニーチェにおけるの概念 : 芸術経験における視覚と身体
- アポロンの幻視 : 初期ニーチェ芸術論への視覚論からのアプローチ(第五十五回美学会全国大会発表要旨)
- Art and Philosophy Reconciled : Nietzsche's Apollonian in and after The Birth of Tragedy (The First Seijo International Colloquium of Art Studies : Art as Representation of the World)
- 芸術作品における闘争 : ハイデガー『芸術作品の根源』より
- 仮想意図主義の有効性 : 現代アートの作品解釈をめぐって(第六十二回美学会全国大会発表要旨)
- 現実意図主義の暇疵