Subjective judgments of L2 oral narratives among native speakers, non-native teachers, and peers
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
The purpose of this study was to compare the perceptions of Japanese learners' oral proficiency by rater groups with different backgrounds. Three rater groups participated in the study: 12 native teachers of English (NT), 14 non-native teachers of English (NNT), and 42 non-native learners of English (NNL). They all listened to one-minute oral narratives of 20 Japanese university students and made a subjective judgment based on four linguistic categories (fluency, grammar, pronunciation, and vocabulary). Statistical analyses of the data indicate that the three rater groups do not differ significantly from one another in their perceptions. The study implies that with no special training provided or marking protocols at hand, peer evaluation has potential as a measure of the spoken language.
- 外国語教育メディア学会の論文
著者
関連論文
- Distinctive Features of Oral Production by Fluent and Nonfluent EFL Learners
- Subjective judgments of L2 oral narratives among native speakers, non-native teachers, and peers
- TESTING OF PROFICIENCY IN FOUR TYPES OF ENGLISH SENTENCES
- The Effect of Retrieval and Elaboration Practices on Vocabulary Learning(research paper,Tomorrow's Learners, Tomorrow's Teachers : Autonomous Development in College English Language Learning and Teaching)
- Access to Universal Grammar in Japanese ESL/EFL Learners : What does Impoverished Input Imply in Second Language Acquisition ?
- The effects of word length and word familiarity on vocabulary learning(The Application of Contemporary Language Theories to Higher English Education: Focusing on the Importance of Content-based and Context-based Approaches)