地域福祉推進と社会福祉施設(高田眞治名誉教授追悼号)
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
Some people believe that it may be necessary for social welfare facilities, primarily those that resemble prisons, to collapse due to some evil or non-beneficial reasons. On the other hand, some people believe that these facilities have the function and role in order to benefit and contribute to the promotion of community well-being. In short, social welfare facilities are space as discussed by Nagata (2001:83). Nagata argus that social welfare facilities have been playing an important role in community well-being, and that they can also contribute to the systematic development of community well-being. In addition, social welfare facilities may well contribution to policy formation of community well-being in the future. For that reason, I bnelieve that social welfare facilities must serve to form "remark theory 'pulbic space'" and "Consensus building 'public space'" in promoting community well-being. t"remark theory 'public space'" is a space where people who have a diverse sense of values meet based on the idea of the plural (Arendt, 1958:75), where they talk and recognize the existence of each other. This is a space with which solidarity and cooperation are formed within, and where the diversity of values coming into contact as well as the recognition of existence gives rise to "remark theory space" as argued by Yamawaki (2004:20), and Saito (2001). Public space is created when there is communication between the self and others; connections are formed between the peopel who meet and talk, and connections between people overlap. Public space is also a possible first training space where people form a unity of being and existence (Saito, 2004:275-276). The system whereby "remark theory 'public space'" is the base and negotiates with administrative concerns of "Consensus building 'Public space'" results in the construction of policy.
- 関西学院大学の論文
著者
関連論文
- 韓国の地域福祉推進における市民団体の現状と可能性についての一考察
- 地域福祉推進と社会福祉施設(高田眞治名誉教授追悼号)
- 地域福祉推進と『公共的空間』
- 地域福祉政策における公私協働関係のあり方について一考察--ガバナンス論を分析視点として