「歴史主義」の意味の混亂(史學科開設五十周年記念)
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
Prof. K. R. Popper coined a new word "historicism" quite independently of the German "Historismus" under which he meant a method of social science which makes historical prediction possible on the basis of a certain law. But the German counterpart "Historismus" already had a particular meaning of itsself in the history of modern European thought, that is, a special kind of historical knowledge which is both intuitional and unscientific rather than conceptual and scientific. Evidently "historicism ", in Popper's use, has a meaning contrary to that of Meinecke and Dilthey. It is a matter of more than a mere exercise in semantics to make a word with a traditional meaning carry forcibly another which is diametrically opposed to the former. After creating the new meaning of historicism in this way, Prof. Popper discarded it maintaining that there could be found no scientific reliability and he went so far as to deny the possibility of such a science. He says, "we must reject the possibility of a theoretical history, ……historicism collapses" (The Poverty of Historicism). In denying the new concept of "historicism", Prof. Popper inadvertently came to the same conclusion as German historicists did. However the grounds for which he abandoned the scientific concept of historicism entirely differ from those of the German scholars. To Popper the Marxism, for instance, is not scientific at all, while to Meinecke among others it is scientific. What, then, is "historicism" which is not science to one but is science to another ? We shall be saved from this terminological confusion, if we apply the traditional name "philosophy of history" or "metaphysics of history" to "historicism". As regards "historicism" first christened by Prof. Popper, I am of another opinion. In the field of social science, we are now in a position to find out a law which is analogous, though in approximation, in structure to the laws of natural science, physical or biological. I approve, therefore, the scientific historicism to a certain degree, though I do not intend to have recourse to such an ambiguous concept as "historicism".
- 慶應義塾大学の論文
著者
関連論文
- 『比較文明と歴史哲学』
- 草創期の三田史学-1-歴史観の視点から (三田史学の100年を語る) -- (第1回座談会(1990年6月16日(土)))
- 福沢諭吉と田中萃一郎の歴史観
- 西洋史の先学たち(一)(第一回座談会,三田史学の百年を語る)
- 草創期の三田史学(一) : 歴史観の視点から(第一回座談会,三田史学の百年を語る)
- 慶応義塾と歴史哲学(文学部創設百周年記念論文集I)
- 刊行のことば
- 「理解」から「説明」へ : 歴史的認識の一問題として
- A. Donagan and B. Donagan, Philosophy of History, A Macmillan Series, 1965 / G. H. Nadel (ed.), Studies in the Philosophy of History, Harper Torchbooks, 1965(REVIEW)
- 事態の論理をこえて
- 歴史哲学の二つのアンソロジー(批評と紹介)
- 事実の客観性と関係の客観性 : E. H. Carrの歴史哲学批判(間崎万里先生頌寿記念)
- 「歴史主義」の意味の混亂(史學科開設五十周年記念)
- 歴史事象の一回限り性について
- Joseph Lortz, Geschichte der Kirche, in ideengeschichtlicher Betrachtung, Munster Westfalen, 17 und 18 Auflage, 1953
- 歴史の科學性の限界
- ランケ史學の根柢に對する歴史哲學的一考察
- ボナヴェントゥラの類比的直觀
- 新プラトン的『流出説』の一問題
- 歴史的説明の論理の問題(橋本孝先生古希記念論文集)