ボナヴェントゥラの類比的直觀
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
It goes without saying that there is nothing commensurable substantially between God and His creatures in the same genus. But, since creatures exist actually in participating with God, there is something to make possible to be commensurate both terms at least analogically. In order to remind us its possibility most positively, St. Bonaventure asserted such a doctrine of divine expressionism as God expresses Himself in His totality and perfection in the results of His creation-by this expressionism he believed to be able to make his own theocentrism perfect. Thus the creatures impressed God's image by God Himself should be similar to the totality of Him even to the personal relation, but not in the substantial participation, but in the expressed similitude. As the relation between the creatures and the Creator has the similar relation between a sign and its meaning, we can recognize God through the creatures as well as the meaning through the sign. St. Bonaventure explained us such a recognition by the term "contuitio," analogical intuition, that is a particular conception which has epistemological foundation on the theory of illumination of the Plato-Augustinism. According to the Pseudo-Dionysius' formula the creatures are disposed on the hierarchy which is diffusively emanated from a divine source. Analogical concejtion seemed to be situated in it-the material world that is far from the origin is "vestiglum," the spiritual world, nearer to the origin, is "imago," and sanctified spirit is "similitudo." "Ex tantis indiciis" we can see (contueri) God, and travel to God Himself following these vestiges-he said this travel "Itinerarium mentis in Deum." Put we cannot use these analogical conceptions as the method for the purpose of getting a conception of "being." It is because, by these analogical conceptions he intended not to define the term "being," but merely toresearch a vestige, of God "Fabricator" imaresied upon the creatures. So in a word it is a symbolical conception, threfore the contuition of St. Bonaventure contributed far less to the formation of the analogical conceptions in the scholastic logic, than to the foundastion of christian humanism as a symbolical mysticism which conserved firmly and made us conscious the principles of the primacy of spirituality, solemnity of person and sanctification of body.
- 慶應義塾大学の論文
著者
関連論文
- 『比較文明と歴史哲学』
- 草創期の三田史学-1-歴史観の視点から (三田史学の100年を語る) -- (第1回座談会(1990年6月16日(土)))
- 福沢諭吉と田中萃一郎の歴史観
- 西洋史の先学たち(一)(第一回座談会,三田史学の百年を語る)
- 草創期の三田史学(一) : 歴史観の視点から(第一回座談会,三田史学の百年を語る)
- 慶応義塾と歴史哲学(文学部創設百周年記念論文集I)
- 刊行のことば
- 「理解」から「説明」へ : 歴史的認識の一問題として
- A. Donagan and B. Donagan, Philosophy of History, A Macmillan Series, 1965 / G. H. Nadel (ed.), Studies in the Philosophy of History, Harper Torchbooks, 1965(REVIEW)
- 事態の論理をこえて
- 歴史哲学の二つのアンソロジー(批評と紹介)
- 事実の客観性と関係の客観性 : E. H. Carrの歴史哲学批判(間崎万里先生頌寿記念)
- 「歴史主義」の意味の混亂(史學科開設五十周年記念)
- 歴史事象の一回限り性について
- Joseph Lortz, Geschichte der Kirche, in ideengeschichtlicher Betrachtung, Munster Westfalen, 17 und 18 Auflage, 1953
- 歴史の科學性の限界
- ランケ史學の根柢に對する歴史哲學的一考察
- ボナヴェントゥラの類比的直觀
- 新プラトン的『流出説』の一問題
- 歴史的説明の論理の問題(橋本孝先生古希記念論文集)