パトロクロスの死
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
In the description of Patroklos' death (Π 788-858) Apollo overcomes the hero with his own hand and knocks down his arms to earth, at the same time Euphorbos strikes him with a spear before Hektor give him a death blow. It seems, however, to be no great honor for Hektors to kill his enemy who is already wounded by the other hero, but there arises also the another question how he could rob him of his arms (cf. P 13, 125, esp. 205) if these were knocked down to earth. Now the present writer infers from many passages in the Iliad that there must have existed a poem on the death of Achilles which in many ways influenced the description of Patroklos' death. In the Iliad Apollo's intervention is to be explained from the fact that the hero wears Achilles' arms which the gods gave to Peleus as a wedding gift and that there is no Trojan who could check his advance. That the arms given or made by a god possess special qualities can be seen in many allusions to the invulnerability of Achilles' old and new arms, especially in the scene of 'kerostasia' where the scales of Zeus finally decide the fate of the heroes who both wear invincible arms. As for the fact that Apollo overcomes the hero with his own hand, it is unparalleled in the Greek epic and shows a most striking contrast to the death of Achilles. The latter is killed, as he tries to take Troy, by Apollo and Paris, and there can be no doubt that both, being noted for archery, used bows as weapons to overcome him. The difference, however, lies in that Patroklos does not wear his own, but Achilles' arms and that in a battle of those days the lending of one's arms necessarily leads to a disguise (cf. Π 41 f, 278 f) which may, however, be revealed eventually. Indeed, in the case of Patroklos the disguise and recognition is almost suppressed, with an evident intention on the part of the poet to heighten the effect of the hero's aristeia (for the disguise in a battle is contrary to the epic conception of a hero who tries to gain a good name for himself). But a close scrutiny of Patroklos' death shows that the stripping of his arms originally meant the recognition of a disguised hero. The poet of the Iliad, while he suppressed the disguise of Patroklos, used the motif of recognition to describe more vividly the tragic death of the hero struck with ατη. The role of Euphorbos, therefore, is but an extention of Apollo's act: he strikes Patroklos in the very same place as does the god who takes it upon himself to show who the hero really is. It follows then that here Apollo (=Euphorbos) and Hektor take over the roles played by Apollo and Paris in the death of Achilles. The contradictions as seen above are but the results of this development. The present writer sees the same motif of recognition, assuredly a popular one in the Greek epic, in Σ 203 ff where Achilles reveals himself to the Trojans and routs them with his shouts. For Iris explicitly bids him to show himself, i. e. to show that he is still alive, although Hektor has taken and put on his arms, a symbol of heroic honor and quality. Finally to be noted are many parallels between the death of Patroklos and that of Hektor: the death scenes of the two heroes etc.
- 日本西洋古典学会の論文
- 1969-03-25
著者
関連論文
- シンポジウム : 地中海の知のかたち (地中海 : 知の継承と変遷)
- 古代叙事詩の序歌 : 「アエネイス」について
- 『オデュッセイア』におけるテーレマコス
- 『オイディプース王』再考
- SCHMITT, ARBOGAST, Selbstandigkeit und Abhangigkeit menschlichen Handelns bei Homer. Hermeneutische Untersuchungen zur Psychologie Homers., Pp. 328, Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur, Mainz & Franz Steiner Verlag, Stuttgart, 1990. DM78.00.
- Mommsen-Gesellschaft第20回大会について
- ホメロスの独創性 : 『イリアス』と「城市を滅ぼすアキレウス」
- BERRES, Thomas, Die Entstehung der Aeneis., Hermes-Einzelschriften, Heft 45., Pp. xii+337, Franz Steiner Verlag, Wiesbaden, 1982.
- THILL, Andree, ALTER AB ILLO. Recherches sur l'imitation dans la poesie personnelle a l'epoque augusteenne., Pp. xi+546, Societe d'Edition, Paris, 1979.
- ホメロスの比喩の言語
- ホメロスの formula と「独創性」の問題
- SCHADEWALDT, Wolfgang, Der Aufbau der Ilias. Strukturen und Konzeptionen., 100 S., Insel Verlag, Frankfurt a. M., 1975.
- NICOLAI, Walter, Kleine und grosse Darstellungseinheiten in der Ilias, Bibliothek der klassischen Altertumswissenschaften, N. F. 2. Reihe, Bd. 47., 159 S., Carl Winter, Heidelberg, 1973.
- IliasとAchilleusの怒り : Helene, Chryseis, Briseis
- 藤繩謙三, ギリシア神話の世界観, 287頁+XI, 新潮選書, 新潮社, 1971
- LOHMANN, Dieter, Die Komposition der Reden in der Ilias, X+309, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1970
- FENIK, Bernard, Typical Battle Scenes in the Iliad. Studies in the narrative techniques of Homeric battle description, Hermes Einzelschriften, Heft 21, 256 S., Wiesbaden, 1968
- SCHMIDT, Volkmar, Sprachliche Untersuchungen zu Herondas. Mit einem Hritischexegetischen Anhang, 1969, Walter de Gruyter & Co., Berlin, S. 141, Ganzleinen DM 42
- DAVISON, J. A., From Archilochus to Pindar. Papers on Greek Literature of the Archaic Period. With a forword by W. B. Stanford, MacMillan, London 1968., pp. xxvii+346
- GRUMACH, Ernst, Bibliographie der kretisch-mykenischen Epigraphik, Supplement I (1962-1965), xxx+126 S., Munchen, C. H. Beck'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung, 1967
- BARTONEK, A, ed., Studia Mycenaea, Proceedings of the Mycenaean Symposium Brno April 1966, Pp. 260, Brno, Universita J. E. Purkyne, 1968
- パトロクロスの死
- BUTTERWORTH, E. A. S., Some Traces of the Pre-Olympian World in Greek Literature and Myth, Pp. x+196+17 plates, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, 1966, DM48
- PALMER, L. R. and CHADWICK, J., ed., Cambridge Colloquium on Mycenaean Studies, Pp. vii+310, Cambridge University Press, 1966, 84 s
- 藤縄謙三, ホメロスの世界, 至誠堂新書24, 東京, 昭和40年
- KURZ, G., Darstellungsformen menschlieher Bewegung in der Ilias, 188 S., Bibliothek der klassischen Altertumswissenschaften, Neue Folge 2. Reihe, Heidelberg, Carl-Winter-Verlag
- G. S. KIRK : The Songs of Homer, pp.424, Cambridge University Press, 1962.
- Karl REINHARDT : Die Ilias und ihr Dichter, herausgegeben von U. Holscher, 540 S., Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, Gottingen, 1961.
- GRUMACH, Ernst : Bibliographie der kretisch-mykenischen Epigraphik (nach dem Stande vom 31, Dezember 1961), XXXII+256 S., Munchen und Berlin : C. H. Beck'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung, 1963.
- WESTMAN, Rolf : Das Futurpartizip als Ausdrucksmittel bei Seneca. Societas Scientiarum Fennica. Commentationes Humanarum Litterarum XXVII., 3,238, S. Helsinki, 1961
- 英雄伝説として見たヘーラクレースのαθλοιの問題 : 古代近東文学との関聯において
- 英雄伝説として見たヘーラクレースのαθλοιの問題--古代近東文学との関聨において
- STELLA, Luigia Achillea, Il Poema di Ulisse. Pp. XVI+443 (Biblioteca di Cultura. 47.) Firenze, La Nuova Italia, 1955
- KULLMANN, Wolfgang, Das Wirken der Gotter in der Ilias. Untersuchungen zur Frage der Entstehung des homerischen 'Gotterapparats', 161 S., Berlin, Akademie-Verlag, 1956
- Stella,Luigia;Il Poema di Ulisse,1955
- PAGE, Denys, The Homeric Odyssey. The Mary Flexner Lectures delivered at Bryn Mawr College, Pennsylvania, Pp. vi. 186, Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1955