歴史における選択と習慣(大会特別講演)

概要

論文の詳細を見る
This paper questions the current disciplinary boundaries between action defined as 'economic' (and analysed by economists and economic historians as such) and the rest of social life, which is generally left to other specialists. This involves addressing the supposedly antithetical approaches of social science on the one hand and hermeneutic enquiry on the other. Starting with a brief autobiographical excursus that implicitly highlights the close relationship between the subject and the object of study, the supposed polarisations between science and description, deduction and induction, quantitative and qualitative approaches, numbers and words are considered. Finally, the concept of everyday life is discussed as a sort of second nature in which people orientate themselves without deliberate reflection: a set of influences that frame all decision making within norms and values that emanate from home, family, community and locality. Everyday life-habitual and unreflective-has not been the focus of either history or social science. It has been particularly absent from economic analysis because of exclusive concentration upon deliberative, 'rational' action and choice. Via brief discussion of the overlap between heterodox economics and a hermeneutic understanding of everyday actions that have a material impact, the paper concludes with an argument in favour of a complementarity rather than a bifurcation of approaches in economic history.
社会経済史学会の論文
2006-09-25

歴史における選択と習慣(大会特別講演)

スポンサーリンク

概要

著者

関連論文

スポンサーリンク