ふつうなら,満足 : フィードバックされた成績が心理テストの妥当性評価に与える影響(心理学分野)
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
This experiment was conducted in order to examine if being average has positive connotation for Japanese. Japanese adults evaluated validity and reliability of a developing psychology test that measures social sensitivity or cognitive structuring ability, after receiving bogus feedback about their performance on the tests (high, average, or low). They also evaluated to what extent they were convinced about their results. The participants were satisfied with being average as well as when they were high performer, which would reflect Japanese value placed on being average. As for validity and reliability of the tests, the results were complicated. As for the social sensitivity test, those who received high feedback and average feedback evaluated the test more valid than those who were evaluated as low. As for the cognitive structuring test, those who received average feedback evaluated the test most valid. This pattern implies they believe that they are above average on social sensitivity but about average on cognitive structuring. We can say that Japanese self-concept is not necessarily negative, but positive about some abilities.
著者
関連論文
- ふつうなら,満足 : フィードバックされた成績が心理テストの妥当性評価に与える影響(心理学分野)
- J029 文系学生に対する心理統計教育 : カリキュラムの視点から(自主シンポジウム)
- 心理学に対するイメージ(2)一般市民対象のオンライン調査より
- 心理学に対するイメージ(1)心理専攻学部生と非心理専攻学部生を対象とした横断的研究
- 「ふつう」の望ましさについての発達的変化-小学生・中学生・大学生の比較-
- 文科系学生の心理統計の授業理解に影響を与える要因についての予備的研究