ドイツにおける社会国家の途 : 第二帝政期から現代に至るまでの歴史的経験(大会報告・共通論題:格差拡大社会-史的接近と現状分析-)
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
Even though the market economy is at the core of the socio-economic order in modern Germany, certain adjustment has been necessary due to limits on its function and coverage. It was not always the State but primarily individual consanguineous, territorially-connected and/or multiple social linkages (or solidarity), which carried out this adjustment. However, as the extent of economic activity expanded and each nation state became firmly established as an economic unit, social problems became a growing concern and the State could not ignore its social responsibilities. Social benefits in Germany after the enactment of legislation creating the "Workers' Insurance" in the 1880s were a typical expression of this trend. However, existing communities or solidarity associations not infrequently hindered the development of a system of nationwide solidarity. Friction was often generated between individual interests which promoted the conservation of social and economic differences, and the intention to expand social cooperation to the nationwide scale. Even though nationwide solidarity was functionally ineffective in the severe economic circumstances of the depression, and a national community was once built forcibly at the cost of enormous sacrifice, the concept of nationwide solidarity became a generally established principle in the Federal Republic of Germany (FRG) after WWII within the system of the market economy. This nationwide solidarity was further complemented by communities or associations for solidarity in various dimensions in the form of pluralistic function in the social welfare system. In the FRG the "Welfare State" was not pursued as a providing state, but as a "Sozialstaat"(Social State) on a philosophical foundation, derived from a full consideration of the nature of the market economy. In this concept of a "Social State", the realization of fair distribution and the elimination of inappropriate social and economic difference was to be pursued, at least in the speculative dimension, in a fashion compatible with the market economy and without hindering its effectiveness or incentives to individual economic activity. Although factors such as the ending of rapid economic growth after WWII or the "oil shock" might expose difficulties or limits of the enhancement of social benefits, this did not provoke a fundamental dismantling or reconstruction of the system of social benefits in the FRG. It might be thought that this was because of a solid agreement about the nature of the "social state" in Germany, but recent movements contradict this interpretation. Even the Social Democratic Party is now willing to cut back the welfare system in the face of economic difficulties brought about by strong economic competition due to globalization and regional integration. It is to be wondered what happened to the philosophical constructs underlying the fairness of distribution and the health of the market economy. In this sense, the dynamism of the "social state" is still a meaningful field for research.
- 2007-04-30
著者
関連論文
- 安野正明著, 『戦後ドイツ社会民主党史研究序説-組織改革とゴーデスベルク綱領への道-』, ミネルヴァ書房, 2004年, ix+363+31頁
- 川越修・辻英史編著, 『社会国家を生きる-20世紀ドイツにおける国家・共同性・個人-』, 法政大学出版局, 2008年, viii+346+iv頁
- ドイツにおける社会国家の途 : 第二帝政期から現代に至るまでの歴史的経験(大会報告・共通論題:格差拡大社会-史的接近と現状分析-)
- ドイツ失業保険法の成立過程
- 木下秀雄著, 『ビスマルク労働者保険法成立史』, 有斐閣, 1997年, x+236+ii頁
- ドイツ第二帝政期ライヒ保険法の成立過程とその社会政策的意義 : ライヒ政府と産業界との相剋を中心に
- 山田誠著, 『ドイツ型福祉国家の発展と変容-現代ドイツ地方財政研究-』, ミネルヴァ書房, 1996年, xiii+373頁