Message Planning and Lexical Encoding in Sentence Production : A View from Japanese Existential Construction
スポンサーリンク
概要
- 論文の詳細を見る
Griffin & Bock (2000) monitored the eye-movement of speakers as they describe simple events and found that the speakers gaze a certain object before they decide what to say, suggesting that the result supports Wundt's idea of incremental lexical encoding. Sentence formulation, however, involves other stages such as message planning including determination of speakers' point of view, grammatical function assignment, or linearization of constituents (Bock & Levelt, 1994). To examine the time course of these multiple stages, we conducted an eye-tracking experiment in which the participants were required to describe a picture by an existential construction in Japanese where the elements are aligned as Location-Object word order. The result shows that speakers initially gaze the Object at the message planning stage, which was followed by the lexical encoding stage where speakers' gaze is shifted to the Location.
- 社団法人電子情報通信学会の論文
- 2008-08-01
著者
-
Sakai Hiromu
Graduate School of Education, Hiroshima University
-
ONO Hajime
Faculty of Science & Engineering, Kinki University
-
Sakai Hiromu
Graduate School Of Education Hiroshima University
-
Ono Hajime
Kinki Univ. Osaka Jpn
-
Ono Hajime
Faculty Of Foreign Languages Kansai Gaidai University
関連論文
- Processing object relative clauses in the context Another support for the discourse function account for the processing load asymmetry
- Priming effects in Japanese passive sentence production : Evidence from Picture-description task in dialogue
- Integration of wh-phrases and predicates in Japanese sentence processing (思考と言語・人間の言語処理と学習)
- Word order and clause boundary insertion: behavioral and ERP studies (思考と言語)
- Message Planning and Lexical Encoding in Sentence Production : A View from Japanese Existential Construction
- Empathy in mental simulation: can we experience emotional events through another person's eyes? (思考と言語)
- When is the object relative clause easier to process than the subject relative clause?